d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Duffington Post > Bringing You Real News
Prev1484485486487488536Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 11,344
Joined: Jul 2 2019
Gold: 2,170.00
Apr 7 2022 12:43pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 7 2022 05:10pm)
What is it with the average conservative and not respecting guns? He needlessly threatened somebody with deadly force and they responded. There is no way you can be trusted with a gun if you can't see that because you don't respect your weapon.


:rofl:
Member
Posts: 91,172
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Apr 7 2022 12:55pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 7 2022 01:30pm)
Sure, why not? Depends who you're taling to though.

I was pointing out how property is fundamentally antithetical to freedom and responding to his point that government does control property rights.



Agreeing more with Republicans doesn't. Constantly going to bat for Republicans even when they are pushing authoritarian measures does. Which he did for years before Trump, and just continued that trend into Trump's presidency.


depends on how you define freedom, and how you think your freedom should or shouldnt interact with another person's freedom.

the freedom lost in going somewhere thats private property is offset by freedom gained from restricting access to your own private property.

private property itself can be enforced by you with force, or the govt with force. i dont think even staunch libertarians would trade a deed of land for an ever existing sense of paranoia and a gun constantly in hand.
Member
Posts: 52,050
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Apr 7 2022 01:13pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 7 2022 01:55pm)
depends on how you define freedom, and how you think your freedom should or shouldnt interact with another person's freedom.

the freedom lost in going somewhere thats private property is offset by freedom gained from restricting access to your own private property.

private property itself can be enforced by you with force, or the govt with force. i dont think even staunch libertarians would trade a deed of land for an ever existing sense of paranoia and a gun constantly in hand.


I believe in this sense, thor's idea of freedom is to be able to go anywhere he wants unless someone is there to stop him.
Member
Posts: 91,172
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Apr 7 2022 01:17pm
Quote (Santara @ Apr 7 2022 02:13pm)
I believe in this sense, thor's idea of freedom is to be able to go anywhere he wants unless someone is there to stop him.


the NAP redefines absolute freedom, but people try to skip that and insist libertarians must only want absolute freedom. libertarians also have hypothetical beliefs and beliefs in practice, the same as liberals would in a hypothetical world enact true socialism and strive for literal equality of both opportunity and outcomes.

and thor is still free to do that, until he's caught :)
Member
Posts: 46,823
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,159.69
Apr 7 2022 01:17pm
Quote (Santara @ Apr 7 2022 02:13pm)
I believe in this sense, thor's idea of freedom is to be able to go anywhere he wants unless someone is there to stop him.


https://www.tromsooutdoor.no/articles/allemannsretten-the-freedom-to-roam-in-norway

Quote
What is allemannsretten?
Allemannsretten (meaning "everyman's right") is a law that allows everyone to roam free on uncultivated land in Norway. By cultivated land it means privately owned land, meadows, pastures, gardens, building plots, and industrial sites. In practical sense this means that you are free to hike, camp and enjoy the fresh air in forests, mountains, and coastal areas, which make up the majority of Norwegian nature.

Are there any limitations to the allemannsretten?
While allemannsretten gives you a lot of freedom, it is important to note the following:

Respect nature - do not leave any rubbish in the nature and do not disturb the wildlife. Leave nature the way you wish to find it.

You can hike and camp in uncultivated areas without the consent of the inhabitants as long as you do not disturb them and keep at least 150 meters away from the inhabitants' property. If you want to camp in the same place for more than 2 days, you have get permission from the inhabitants. This does not apply when you camp in the mountains and remote areas.

Campfires in and near forests is prohibited between 15th of April to 15th of September. However, it may be allowed in places where the fire hazard is very unlikely. Please remember that you are legally responsible for ensuring a safe campfire.

Fishing in saltwater by land and small boats is allowed without a license as long as this is for your own use. Hunting and fishing in freshwater is not part of allemannsretten. Hunting and fishing in freshwater areas, such as rivers and lakes, is only possible with the permission of the landowner and those with a license for hunting and fishing, respectively. Foraging mushrooms, berries, herbs and wildflowers is generally allowed. In Northern Norway, cloudberries can only be picked if eaten on the spot where you picked them.


By respecting nature, the animals, and the local inhabitants, we can together ensure that everyone has the chance to enjoy the outdoors. Have a pleasant trip!

Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Apr 7 2022 01:20pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 7 2022 01:55pm)
depends on how you define freedom, and how you think your freedom should or shouldnt interact with another person's freedom.

the freedom lost in going somewhere thats private property is offset by freedom gained from restricting access to your own private property.

private property itself can be enforced by you with force, or the govt with force. i dont think even staunch libertarians would trade a deed of land for an ever existing sense of paranoia and a gun constantly in hand.


Does this not apply to every situation in which property is recognized then? As in a king who owns everything has more freedom which offsets the lack of property of everybody else.

Quote (Santara @ Apr 7 2022 02:13pm)
I believe in this sense, thor's idea of freedom is to be able to go anywhere he wants unless someone is there to stop him.


Going where I want and utilizing anything I want. If we both wash up on an island you don't "own" the coconuts just because you claimed them. Yet that's how all property came into existence. Somebody just claimed it, and then we propagated that into the future.

I'm not saying that having a system of property doesn't give better or worse material outcomes, I'm just saying that we need to acknowledge that, fundamentally, property is a restriction on freedom.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Apr 7 2022 01:21pm
Member
Posts: 52,050
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Apr 7 2022 01:25pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 7 2022 02:17pm)


I think you've posted that before. Scandinavian customs are certainly interesting.
Member
Posts: 46,823
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,159.69
Apr 7 2022 01:26pm
Quote (Santara @ Apr 7 2022 02:25pm)
I think you've posted that before. Scandinavian customs are certainly interesting.


Works when your country is full of Scandinavian people.
Member
Posts: 52,050
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Apr 7 2022 01:27pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 7 2022 02:20pm)
Going where I want and utilizing anything I want. If we both wash up on an island you don't "own" the coconuts just because you claimed them. Yet that's how all property came into existence. Somebody just claimed it, and then we propagated that into the future.

I'm not saying that having a system of property doesn't give better or worse material outcomes, I'm just saying that we need to acknowledge that, fundamentally, property is a restriction on freedom.


Property was generally claimed by labor. If we both wash up on the island, and I climb up the tree and collect the coconuts, they are mine. If I plant seeds to grow more, the fruit of those labors are also mine.
Member
Posts: 26,577
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 19,900.00
Apr 7 2022 01:29pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 7 2022 03:17pm)


This is some Jehovah's witnesses cover pamphlets type shit. Idk how viable it'd be in a much denser & poorer country lol.


Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 7 2022 03:20pm)
Does this not apply to every situation in which property is recognized then? As in a king who owns everything has more freedom which offsets the lack of property of everybody else.



Going where I want and utilizing anything I want. If we both wash up on an island you don't "own" the coconuts just because you claimed them. Yet that's how all property came into existence. Somebody just claimed it, and then we propagated that into the future.

I'm not saying that having a system of property doesn't give better or worse material outcomes, I'm just saying that we need to acknowledge that, fundamentally, property is a restriction on freedom.


Property is a restriction only if you want someone else's property, and I think a fairly central tenant of libertarianism is individuals should have right over their stuff and to protect their stuff. So that means the former, a contradiction, can't hold true (you having the 'freedom' to others stuff). I mean if I'm a marauder yes I want the freedom to come and raid your food garden and have your wife, but under the social contract freedom is limited by where other's freedoms begin.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Apr 7 2022 01:30pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1484485486487488536Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll