d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > How To Get To Heaven When You Die
Prev1479480481482483487Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 7,251
Joined: Oct 9 2021
Gold: 4,661.71
Nov 22 2023 06:03pm
Quote (CPK001 @ Nov 22 2023 10:16pm)
Eyewitness accounts are unreliable and basically worthless? So how do you find out what happens in this day and age since you refuse to go and ask someone who saw the whole thing?

Someone crashes their car and a bystander saw the whole thing, there's no point in asking them since they are an eyewitness and saw the whole thing, right?

Or someone robs a store at gunpoint. There's no point in asking the other customers who were there since they are eyewitnesses, right?

Or you, yourself witnessed some big event. Even though you saw the whole thing there's no point in asking you since you are an eyewitness and are unreliable and basically worthless, right?


Nonono. What you describe are all 1st degree eye witness reports. Those are surely important in many cases, especially crime investigation cases.
Those people PERSONALLY tell what they saw - and if what they saw is significant, they have to testify and they will get interviewed/interrogated.
What they say will be thoroughly investigated and checked.

The eye witness accounts we talk about here are written down. Probably by someone else and bit the witness. And even if not, those are impossible to investigate. Also on top of that, those are over a thousand years old. No one knows how much those were altered over the centuries. How is this evidence for anything?

One if my best buddies is a police officer and he once told me that cold cases are the worst when they are made public after a while when the police doesnt know how to continue the investigation. The moment you share information about the case with the public, countless eye witness reports come in. They call in, come to the office, write e-mails, whatever. Close to 100% of those are absolutely worthless. Sometimes because the information is just irrelevant, but mostly because what they think they saw is just wrong. They misinterpret what they think they saw. Those people arent even lying, they are convinced of whatever they think they witnessed. People have seen this or that, describe this or that person, saw a specific car and so on. Its a dead end, get proven to be wrong almost all the time and causes nothing but work. They are bot to blame, the human mind is tricked very easily. Sometimes you see what you wanna see, sometimes you see what you fear to see. Thats how it is. Thats reality.
Member
Posts: 17,574
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 22 2023 09:17pm
Quote (Modulok2405 @ Nov 23 2023 10:03am)
Nonono. What you describe are all 1st degree eye witness reports. Those are surely important in many cases, especially crime investigation cases.
Those people PERSONALLY tell what they saw - and if what they saw is significant, they have to testify and they will get interviewed/interrogated.
What they say will be thoroughly investigated and checked.

The eye witness accounts we talk about here are written down. Probably by someone else and bit the witness. And even if not, those are impossible to investigate. Also on top of that, those are over a thousand years old. No one knows how much those were altered over the centuries. How is this evidence for anything?

One if my best buddies is a police officer and he once told me that cold cases are the worst when they are made public after a while when the police doesnt know how to continue the investigation. The moment you share information about the case with the public, countless eye witness reports come in. They call in, come to the office, write e-mails, whatever. Close to 100% of those are absolutely worthless. Sometimes because the information is just irrelevant, but mostly because what they think they saw is just wrong. They misinterpret what they think they saw. Those people arent even lying, they are convinced of whatever they think they witnessed. People have seen this or that, describe this or that person, saw a specific car and so on. Its a dead end, get proven to be wrong almost all the time and causes nothing but work. They are bot to blame, the human mind is tricked very easily. Sometimes you see what you wanna see, sometimes you see what you fear to see. Thats how it is. Thats reality.


Let's take what we do know. There was always a very large crowd following Jesus around. This means there is no shortage of eyewitnesses. Here is an example.

Luke 5:17-26

Jesus Forgives and Heals a Paralyzed Man

17 One day Jesus was teaching, and Pharisees and teachers of the law were sitting there. They had come from every village of Galilee and from Judea and Jerusalem. And the power of the Lord was with Jesus to heal the sick. 18 Some men came carrying a paralyzed man on a mat and tried to take him into the house to lay him before Jesus. 19 When they could not find a way to do this because of the crowd, they went up on the roof and lowered him on his mat through the tiles into the middle of the crowd, right in front of Jesus.

20 When Jesus saw their faith, he said, “Friend, your sins are forgiven.”

21 The Pharisees and the teachers of the law began thinking to themselves, “Who is this fellow who speaks blasphemy? Who can forgive sins but God alone?”

22 Jesus knew what they were thinking and asked, “Why are you thinking these things in your hearts? 23 Which is easier: to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say, ‘Get up and walk’? 24 But I want you to know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins.” So he said to the paralyzed man, “I tell you, get up, take your mat and go home.” 25 Immediately he stood up in front of them, took what he had been lying on and went home praising God. 26 Everyone was amazed and gave praise to God. They were filled with awe and said, “We have seen remarkable things today.”

What this means is that there is no shortage of people whom Luke could have interviewed. Everyone would have given their own version and the final version would have made it into his report. One person might have mentioned something that nobody else has but Luke could have asked and found that to be false.

These are not just eyewitness accounts of 1-3 people but an entire crowd worth of testimonies. Back then they didn't have cell phones or e-mails. This is all 100% interviewed. I don't see the problem with eyewitness accounts when there was always an entire crowd worth of people to interview.
Member
Posts: 7,251
Joined: Oct 9 2021
Gold: 4,661.71
Nov 23 2023 12:20am
Quote (CPK001 @ Nov 23 2023 04:17am)
Let's take what we do know. There was always a very large crowd following Jesus around. This means there is no shortage of eyewitnesses. Here is an example.

Luke 5:17-26

Jesus Forgives and Heals a Paralyzed Man

17 One day Jesus was teaching, and Pharisees and teachers of the law were sitting there. They had come from every village of Galilee and from Judea and Jerusalem. And the power of the Lord was with Jesus to heal the sick. 18 Some men came carrying a paralyzed man on a mat and tried to take him into the house to lay him before Jesus. 19 When they could not find a way to do this because of the crowd, they went up on the roof and lowered him on his mat through the tiles into the middle of the crowd, right in front of Jesus.

20 When Jesus saw their faith, he said, “Friend, your sins are forgiven.”

21 The Pharisees and the teachers of the law began thinking to themselves, “Who is this fellow who speaks blasphemy? Who can forgive sins but God alone?”

22 Jesus knew what they were thinking and asked, “Why are you thinking these things in your hearts? 23 Which is easier: to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say, ‘Get up and walk’? 24 But I want you to know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins.” So he said to the paralyzed man, “I tell you, get up, take your mat and go home.” 25 Immediately he stood up in front of them, took what he had been lying on and went home praising God. 26 Everyone was amazed and gave praise to God. They were filled with awe and said, “We have seen remarkable things today.”

What this means is that there is no shortage of people whom Luke could have interviewed. Everyone would have given their own version and the final version would have made it into his report. One person might have mentioned something that nobody else has but Luke could have asked and found that to be false.

These are not just eyewitness accounts of 1-3 people but an entire crowd worth of testimonies. Back then they didn't have cell phones or e-mails. This is all 100% interviewed. I don't see the problem with eyewitness accounts when there was always an entire crowd worth of people to interview.


HOW do you know that what you read was even reported by an eye witness?

The moment you begin with "Lets take what we do know". Dude listen, we dont know anything. Its too long ago, bro. You understand that? How do you that ANYTHING you just quoted even happened. Do you understand why this has no value? Its just stories. No one knows if anything of it ever happened. Maybe there wasnt a crowd following Jesus. Thats not a historical event. Its a myth.

Only two events of Jesus life are widely accepted as historical (widely accepted, not proven) namely his baptism and crucifixion. There is no scholarly consensus concerning any other elements of Jesus life (including his purported miracles or resurrection

This post was edited by Modulok2405 on Nov 23 2023 12:35am
Member
Posts: 17,574
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 23 2023 04:40am
Quote (Modulok2405 @ Nov 23 2023 04:20pm)
HOW do you know that what you read was even reported by an eye witness?

The moment you begin with "Lets take what we do know". Dude listen, we dont know anything. Its too long ago, bro. You understand that? How do you that ANYTHING you just quoted even happened. Do you understand why this has no value? Its just stories. No one knows if anything of it ever happened. Maybe there wasnt a crowd following Jesus. Thats not a historical event. Its a myth.

Only two events of Jesus life are widely accepted as historical (widely accepted, not proven) namely his baptism and crucifixion. There is no scholarly consensus concerning any other elements of Jesus life (including his purported miracles or resurrection


How do I know these things? I'll show you.



Let's read the opening of Luke 1.

1 Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, 2 just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. 3 With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4 so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.

Get it?
Member
Posts: 7,251
Joined: Oct 9 2021
Gold: 4,661.71
Nov 23 2023 05:16am
Quote (CPK001 @ Nov 23 2023 11:40am)
How do I know these things? I'll show you.

https://chicagoshadydealer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Holy-Bible.jpg

Let's read the opening of Luke 1.

1 Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, 2 just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. 3 With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4 so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.

Get it?


Seriously? Is that your answer? You show me the bible again and show a text as evidence for its contains? You basically always try to prove the bible with the bible, dude :lol: :wallbash:

This post was edited by Modulok2405 on Nov 23 2023 05:17am
Member
Posts: 17,574
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 24 2023 02:29am
Quote (Modulok2405 @ Nov 23 2023 09:16pm)
Seriously? Is that your answer? You show me the bible again and show a text as evidence for its contains? You basically always try to prove the bible with the bible, dude :lol: :wallbash:


Alright, let's talk about whether we can or cannot trust the Bible.

It just so happens that, a decade ago, the Church I was at did a 10 questions series. The very first topic was: Can You Really Trust The Bible? I took down notes and posted the topic on this very forum. Here is the link: https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=66318140&f=125

Here is a quote from within that very post:

Quote
The first thing I must ask you is this: Would you be prepared to trust The Bible if the evidence were there? Carefully ponder this question before you move on.

Don't trust The Bible.

Many people don't trust The Bible due to various reasons. One of them being that it is a very old book. Something written 2000 years ago isn't reliable to today's standards.
Perhaps people back then weren't that smart, they didn't have the internet, wikipedia or any of that kind of stuff. That could be further from the truth.

The time of the New Testament was a time of literacy, everybody wrote stuff down. Everybody wanted to learn. To sum it all up in an age, I'd call it the Age of Education.
Basically, education back then meant a big deal. Being a Rabbi or teacher back then was a big deal. That is what Jesus was, a Rabbi, a teacher. In a nutshell, everything we know today has all come from what they all learned all those years ago.

Conspiracy Theory.
"Most conspiracy theories don't make sense nor withstand any scrutiny. They usually involve operations so immense that it's basically impossible for them to be kept secret, and all the proof given by conspiracy theorists usually have a very simple explanation (usually much simpler than the explanation given by the theorists)."
Conspiracy Theories generally have very simple explanations. That means the story isn't very detailed. Now when we look at The Bible, the stories are very detailed, look at the smaller detail. I'll list a few examples.


So when I quote Bible verses, they have already been tried and tested. These passages have been proven quite reliable. Any question or loophole you try and come up with can almost always be answered with a Bible verse.

You want to question whether God is trustworthy or a liar? Read Genesis 3.
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 24 2023 02:33pm
Quote (Modulok2405 @ Nov 21 2023 08:50am)
Atheist regimes? Whats that? Which regime is atheistic?

You dont want me to talk about religious regimes killing millions if people right? Or would you then use the great argument that these werent religious because of what they did?
The religious arc of argumentation is and has always been absolutely ridiculous and I am sure yours wont be an exception.


You're either extremely ignorant or intentionally lying

USSR, PRC, Khmer Rouge regime, Nazi regime etc. etc. etc...

So which one is it?

This post was edited by El1te on Nov 24 2023 02:33pm
Member
Posts: 25,139
Joined: Dec 20 2006
Gold: 82,014.68
Warn: 10%
Nov 30 2023 05:24pm
Quote (CPK001 @ Nov 23 2023 04:40am)
How do I know these things? I'll show you.

https://chicagoshadydealer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Holy-Bible.jpg

Let's read the opening of Luke 1.

1 Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, 2 just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. 3 With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4 so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.

Get it?


imagine showing a picture of a book that shows no pictures for a reason.

the free gift was the soul, it was your job to protect it from dead scripts.

5:0'd you:


This post was edited by lodd222 on Nov 30 2023 05:26pm
Member
Posts: 17,574
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
Dec 1 2023 02:00am
Quote (lodd222 @ Dec 1 2023 09:24am)
imagine showing a picture of a book that shows no pictures for a reason.

the free gift was the soul, it was your job to protect it from dead scripts.

5:0'd you:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kic0GGu2UnY


Hebrews 1:1-2

God’s Final Word: His Son

1 In the past God spoke to our ancestors through the prophets at many times and in various ways, 2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom also he made the universe.
Member
Posts: 25,139
Joined: Dec 20 2006
Gold: 82,014.68
Warn: 10%
Dec 1 2023 09:36am
Quote (CPK001 @ Dec 1 2023 02:00am)
Hebrews 1:1-2

God’s Final Word: His Son

1 In the past God spoke to our ancestors through the prophets at many times and in various ways, 2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom also he made the universe.



jesus is right in front of you and youre quoting him scripture. woe to you.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1479480481482483487Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll