Quote (TiStuff @ 4 Aug 2022 10:27)
i already showed you at the very least something is wrong with "global warming"
now its time for you to put it on the line. explain what experiment and exactly how it works to back up your claim masks work.
here is the latest on masks. they are calling it the fogen effect
Facemasks and COVID-19 case fatality rate
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349858647_Facemasks_and_COVID-19_case_fatality_rateexcerpt: The cause of this trend and the possible connection between long-term effects associated with SARS-CoV-2 and facemasks are explained in the theory herein by the ‘foegen effect’; i.e., deep reinhalation of pure virions caught in the facemasks as droplets can worsen the prognosis.
seems to be the same principle that results in bacteria phenomenon. the body breathes stuff out to get rid of it. but with a mask on you just breath it right back in.
the article concludes
This finding suggests that the use of facemasks in COVID-19 pandemic did contribute to an increase in the death toll counterintuitive of its purpose, making mask mandates a highly debatable epidemiologic intervention.
BTW i like the date on your link. just in time to whip up some pro masking to mandate masks
people like this? they dont receive counter arguments they just get "cancelled" do you se a problem with that or do you think that is how science works?
Dr Merritt: Face Masks Don't Work! You're Either Being Paid or Played!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vpffR07rUn87/Well played sir. Finally something that is not complete Ti bullshit.
I don't want to discuss global warming because otherwise we would never be able to focus on one single topic.
So back to covid masks and our 2 research paper links:
First of all, your research paper was published in March 2021. The one I sent was published Dec 2020 and revised in January 2021. So not much difference there.
Now, before you look at the verdict of a research paper, you need to check what a paper tries to solve:
My paper:
Quote
In this narrative review, we develop an analytical framework to examine mask usage, synthesizing the relevant literature to inform multiple areas: population impact, transmission characteristics, source control, wearer protection, sociological considerations, and implementation considerations.
Your paper:
Quote
The purpose of this study was to find if mandatory masking influences the case fatality rate.
So in short, my is focusing on transmission and protection of those who don't have the virus. Yours on the other hand focuses on the health of people who have Covid and are using masks but has nothing to say about the effects of masks in regards to transmission.
This is why the verdict seem so different... Because they try to solve different questions.
So both articles are right in what they try to achieve.
The logical conclusion is:
* Masks are very effective in stopping the spread.
* Stay home if you have covid and if you don't want to wear a mask.
* If you have covid and
must leave the house wear a mask for the sake of your community. As per your own paper "high death rate occurs when you wear facemasks over many hours despite being ill (example given: medical personnel)."
Was a good read, thanks!