The current legal state of things encourages men to be gay or trans. It's the only way they can gain equal legal rights to women.

I've said it before, but I'll repeat: My marriage is great. Certainly not perfect, but works quite well for us both. If she were to die, I probably wouldn't bother with marriage again. It's not useful, and being a man, the liability I'd assume is just not worth the risk. Hell, even dating isn't worth the risk, and to an extent, even dating or hookup apps aren't.

We're getting to a point in society where consent can be withdrawn after the fact, and suddenly it's "rape" even though she literally initiated every damned thing. I can't speak for anyone else, but I never particularly wish to be at that level of mercy of another human being. Because people aren't particularly merciful.

I don't trust men, and I trust women even less. If any given person believes they will gain advantage by making claims against me, they probably will. Therefore, I'd rather just avoid personal relationships. Easier to be a hermit than go through the legalities concerned.

Hopefully my wife outlives me so I don't have to worry about any of that shit.

Know thyself vs. diVIDe & COnquer.

I support polygamy based on religious grounds. If fags can marry, Mormons should be allowed to practice their religion.

Howabout wenches humping and dumping twenty men during a hot girl summer then using your tax dollars to pay for her crotch goblin nonviable offspring?

Sterilization is the answer. Force women to have IUDs and force men to have vasectomies. People who are married can have those easily reversed. This should be done starting in middle school.

If I want to impregnate my 14 year old girlfriend thats my right as an American. You statist intellectually dishonest scum make me sick

To be fair, if you're in the range of 13-16, that probably is your right, as long as she consents.

Noting for the moment that women consensually tend to have 5-10 times as many sexual partners as (non-gay) men, blaming pregnancy on men is kind of lazy.

Pretty sure it's 50/50

That's a pretty radical claim. Gonna need you to give a citation for that.

Tend to think not. The reason men refer to women as promiscuous is that the average woman has 5 to 10 times as many sexual partners as the average man.

There are plenty of men who've suffered 25 years of child support for children not their own for just this reason. His name went on the birth certificate, and even after DNA evidence proved that the child was not his, he still got stuck with the bill.

MGTOW is not and never was about any form of woman hating but instead is about understanding the inherent dangers of interacting with women in this legal age. Fire a woman? Suddenly get a sexual claim that ends your career, and you never even looked at her sideways. Impregnate a woman and she's 50/50 on killing your baby or leaving you for a free paycheck for the next 25 years. Don't like that a woman has power over you? "Keep it in your pants" they say. But wait... Why should she be able to flaunt it incessantly, then when she suffers consequences for doing so, HE is the only one who suffers? HE loses vast swathes of income. HE loses his child. HE faces false charges. HE has to be responsible. Meanwhile, SHE benefits from over two hundred thousand hours of his working life via child support. SHE benefits by not giving birth to his child. SHE benefits from civil gains and spite when he goes to prison on false charges.

Are these every case? Of course not, that'd be stupid. But is it pretty high risk? Yes. Thus, is mocking the viewpoint of these men who have no say other than "keep it in your pants" an acceptable solution? No. Taking away all need for personal responsibility from women isn't "empowering" them. It's merely turning them into tyrants who never have to worry over the consequences of their own actions.



Which claim?

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Aug 18 2021 01:59pm