Quote (Ghot @ Mar 7 2020 10:49am)
My comparison is for comparing medical systems. Aka free and not free. The medical systems have nothing to do with "contracting" the disease.
The percentages of deaths on the other hand, are indicative of the quality of the medical systems in place.
/e Whether or not people in each country "contract" the CV, is more indicative of travel, quaratine and border policies.
Let's try this one more time.
Comparing raw deaths to raw population isn't useful. As you said, you aren't trying to compare the rate of contraction, you're trying to compare the death rate. Because the better medical system would have a higher rate of people surviving the virus, and the worse would have a lower rate of survival.
But here's the catch: you can't die from the virus
unless you catch it first. So you need to compare the number of people who have died from the coronavirus against the number of people who caught it (or compare the number who survived vs the number who caught it--same metric). That will show you the survival rate (or the fatality rate), which would be a useful metric for comparing the healthcare systems.
But you didn't do that. Because you used raw deaths vs raw population. So the metric you first suggested doesn't really mean anything with respect to the healthcare systems. Unless you're concerned with the rate the disease spreads, but as you said before, you aren't concerned with the rate of contraction.
So you need to do (# fatalities)/(# total cases in nation) to get a meaningful number.
Does that help your understanding?