but ohhh the implications of this !!

population may halt its increase !! less people to consume commodities !!
people may find happiness in a place not materially based !! these people might consume less !!

you are free so long as you don't threaten capital from being accumulated?

Your anti-capitalism bias is so bad you don't know what reality is.

Because that's what people are thinking about when they vote no...

tell me why you believe it matters in society that gay people get married...

what is the main reasons that so many fight so hard against this from being accepted in society.

Tradition of marriage, cultural thing, etc.

It has nothing to do with capitalism.

What is it with uber liberals hating people living? Oh no, there's too many people!!! I know, lets start a communist government so we can kill a lot of them off, especially the ones whose thought we don't like.

.....

The most cliche and obvious statement would be "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." - Thomas Jefferson.

Now we all know when this was written it did not include all men, it only meant white land owners. People have fought that this should include everyone but now those same people are deny gay rights? Why should they be denied marriage because of their sexual beliefs? Marriage was once a religious thing yes, but now a day it is use as a tradition to express one's love for another. Who has the rights to say who one can love and who they can't? It is entirely unethical in my opinion to deny one of something but lets others do the same exact thing. Hypocritical. That is all for now, it is 4 in the morning and I recently had a debate so I am tired lol.

Thank you for suffering through this post.

Vote yes haha

grimm_stephen, Chasser