d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1477647774778477947805001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,170
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 2 2021 04:33pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 3 Oct 2021 00:01)
except not wearing a mask puts others at risk. So you shouldn't feel the same.


"Not wearing a mask puts others at risk" is not a valid argument unless a rough quantification of this risk is provided. To how much additional risk do maskless people actually expose their fully vaccinated fellows? And how high is this extra risk if the maskless person itself is also fully vaccinated?

Your line of reasoning becomes akin to the (bs) argument that "driving faster than 10 mph puts others at unnecessary risk". Or that "smoking at the bus station should be prohibited because it puts bystanders at risk of developing lung cancer".
Simply put, asking others to sacrifice personal comfort to squeeze out every last bit of risk protection becomes impracticable after a certain point.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 2 2021 04:39pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Oct 2 2021 06:01pm)
except not wearing a mask puts others at risk. So you shouldn't feel the same.


So does not wearing a helmet.

Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 2 2021 06:33pm)
"Not wearing a mask puts others at risk" is not a valid argument unless a rough quantification of this risk is provided. To how much additional risk do maskless people actually expose their fully vaccinated fellows? And how high is this extra risk if the maskless person itself is also fully vaccinated?

Your line of reasoning becomes akin to the (bs) argument that "driving faster than 10 mph puts others at unnecessary risk". Or that "smoking at the bus station should be prohibited because it puts bystanders at risk of developing lung cancer".
Simply put, asking others to sacrifice personal comfort to squeeze out every last bit of risk protection becomes impracticable after a certain point.


Thank you for the more explored answer.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Oct 2 2021 04:40pm
Member
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Oct 2 2021 05:22pm
its almost like existing in this world does come with risks, one way or the other, some serious, others not so much

Member
Posts: 11,344
Joined: Jul 2 2019
Gold: 2,170.00
Oct 2 2021 05:37pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Sep 30 2021 07:23pm)
Israeli airstrikes targeting the Gaza Strip in May 2021

That's some kind of a big explosion.

https://www.francetvinfo.fr/pictures/b7plnpWPx8MpPgbBRyI3Z179N4M/0x133:5126x3024/944x531/filters:format(webp)/2021/05/13/phpJTzIUA.jpg


so beautiful. maybe it was a kindergarten.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 2 2021 05:59pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Oct 2 2021 06:11pm)
you have 700.000 reasons to not doing stupid equivalences


96% of them died of obesity or COPD. Less than 5% of the deaths were COVID alone.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Oct 2 2021 05:59pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Oct 2 2021 06:08pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 2 2021 03:15pm)
If one is willing to completely ignore the CDC's continuous flip-flopping on masks etc., then covid is indeed a bad example to use for his meme. He's got a broader point though, the modern left is indeed very much aligned with the establishment, the state and, on non-economic issues, even with corporate America.

"Obey the establishment" could be the inofficial motto of the modern left. Long gone are the days when the left symbolized counter-culture; nowadays, the left's hegemony over social and cultural institutions is completely lopsided and suffocating; the state itself has in significant parts been co-opted by liberals to serve as a vehicle for their agenda.

https://i.imgur.com/Osqi3pq.jpg

https://i.redd.it/4dgqk80nklu61.jpg

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/073/502/49d.jpeg


Is it? It seems to me that the modern left is very much anti-establishment. The modern left is anti police, anti imperialism, anti corporation, etc. Perhaps you're using the term "modern left" in a very broad sense and including moderate Democrats and Republicans?
Member
Posts: 54,170
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 2 2021 06:30pm
Quote (thundercock @ 3 Oct 2021 02:08)
Is it? It seems to me that the modern left is very much anti-establishment. The modern left is anti police, anti imperialism, anti corporation, etc. Perhaps you're using the term "modern left" in a very broad sense and including moderate Democrats and Republicans?


Mmmmh, I should probably distinguish a bit more between the factions. Technically, the political left encompasses everything to the left of the middle, from Conor Lamb to Cori Bush, from Doug Jones to Bernie Sanders. Maybe our misunderstanding comes from the different terminology you Americans like to use, with "liberal" denoting cookie-cutter leftism and "left" sometimes being used to specifically refer to bold, radical progressives. (Perhaps I should have used the term "modern liberalism" instead of "modern left".)



You're of course right that a big chunk of the activist base and the insurgent left fringe of the Democratic party are still anti-establishment and reject the state's current institutions. But these types don't represent the average lefty voter. Politicians and activists are more ideologically extreme and consistent than ordinary citizens/voters. I would estimate that my characterization of the modern left fits at least 80% of the left-of-center voters. They love their CNN/CBS/NPR, they don't reject the state and rather want it to play a stronger, more active role in their lives, are fine with woke virtue signalling in movies, films and ads, etc.

It should also be noted that culture and the Democratic establishment have zoomed to the left on most issues over the past few years, so that their positioning on the issues has become a lot more palatable to lefty voters than it used to be.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Oct 2 2021 06:34pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 2 2021 06:43pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 2 2021 05:33pm)
"Not wearing a mask puts others at risk" is not a valid argument unless a rough quantification of this risk is provided. To how much additional risk do maskless people actually expose their fully vaccinated fellows? And how high is this extra risk if the maskless person itself is also fully vaccinated?

Your line of reasoning becomes akin to the (bs) argument that "driving faster than 10 mph puts others at unnecessary risk". Or that "smoking at the bus station should be prohibited because it puts bystanders at risk of developing lung cancer".
Simply put, asking others to sacrifice personal comfort to squeeze out every last bit of risk protection becomes impracticable after a certain point.


Stop being intentionally stupid. Driving slowly reduces utility. Masking doesnt. If you think about your example for two seconds you realize how dumb it is, and you're not that dumb, so I can only conclude you're being stupid on purpose to defend shit you know is wrong, like you often do
Member
Posts: 38,671
Joined: Apr 1 2007
Gold: 8.21
Member
Posts: 54,170
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 2 2021 07:04pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 3 Oct 2021 02:43)
Stop being intentionally stupid. Driving slowly reduces utility. Masking doesnt. If you think about your example for two seconds you realize how dumb it is, and you're not that dumb, so I can only conclude you're being stupid on purpose to defend shit you know is wrong, like you often do


wtf lol?!

Of course masking reduces utility in social interactions. Or the utility of doing whatever activity while it's very hot.
It also hampers everyday life for lots of persons wearing glasses.

You incorrectly assume that just because you are not bothered by masks at all, this must automatically mean that everyone else has to feel the same way (or be a gigantic pussy).

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1477647774778477947805001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll