I'd make a great boss.

Get some new material. This has been boring for years bro.

this is a smallminded oversimplification, i support laying the ground work if/when it becomes necessary, in a slow incremental process.

you saying i support UBI after being told what i really support shows you're being disengenuous, especially when u imply it means some massive expansion of the collections pool, when ive said multiple times i dont support that.



no i dont, i said its more responsible. spending money you have is more responsible than spending money your kids need to pay back. i never once said i support an overall massive increase in spending to pay for a 2t$ budget the democrats proposed.

just another signal you dont read for context and just strawman, what a small minded response. and after 10 pages of being corrected on that exact point no less, maybe make an excuse about how u cant be bothered to remember what i say because i dont matter, that'll teach me.



ive said the incremental system for UBI i propose wouldnt balloon collections, maybe 10x now.

ive said im for a slow building on the existing medicare system as a voluntary buy in program, again not ballooning collections.

you have nothing, and are transparently pathetic.



lets follow the flow chart of mental ineptitude here, maybe a nice shiny picture will finally show you how unintelligent of a "point" you made:

>UBI is in essence a govt supporting it's people
>UBI is a communist dreamscape
>China is communist
>if UBI was needed china would be doing it because they're communist

communist countries dont care about their people, let alone want to support them, humans are a natural resource in china. live, die, no one cares.

its not a no-true-scotsmen fallacy in support of communism, its a realistic look at communism as evil and UBI as not evil, and therefore not seeing the two as compatible even on a shallow glance.

UBI doesnt just keep uprisings and unrest down, it keeps the consumer base stable. china is an exporter predominately, and doesnt care about domestic consumption the same way the US or nordic socialized countries do.


you sir, are a low IQ fool. each time i talk with you i drop your IQ 5 points based solely on your own arguments. im getting near the point that i see you as a 40 iq trog that stumbled upon a thesaurus.

He's an 80-90 IQ business major who thinks he's hot shit because he never took a course that was challenging. He got an A+ in balancing checkbooks and walks around like he's a hotshot.

My undergrad had a very well funded business department, so I know his type very well. You show them mathematics that has more than high school level operations and their brain melts out their ears as they retreat back to their comfy excel sheets.

you kinda remind me of this video, please watch

Wretched: An atheist professor converts to Christianity. its only 8:13 minutes long
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3jrcP-o6Vs

bogus joe such a crook they made a song about him
Subpoena Colada
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2tca7meKew

lmao! excellent post my friend

Lol, bet those sheets had nice pivot tables

In my experience, dealing with a bivariate Lagrangian is just about the maximum amount of math that business majors can handle, and even that is a struggle for most of them.

You first made the idiotic contrast that lofty benefits that lead to people not wanting to work are better than starvation.

You then shifted the discussion to talk about UBI. You talk about UBI like the typical college freshmen would, making a bunch of kumbaya assumptions and how this utopian future is totally achievable, we just need UBI!

UBI, in reality, is as left as it comes on the political spectrum and your sophomoric explanations are on the same level of depth of thought as spoiled leftists that have zero understanding of market dynamics or economics.

Currently, no country in the world has UBI. Not even the socialistic Scandinavian havens that have tiny populations where it might possibly work. You know why? Because smart adults that understand math and economics know better. No one took Andrew Yang seriously because his logic and math were shallow and only dumbasses bought into it. Anyone that was half qualified to ask and challenge some of his more in-depth math quickly exposed how his plan was more of a marketing ruse.

Like, look at what happened when the fed pumped 50% of GDP in money supply during Covid. I can show you price inflation in various inputs and products across the board. That's exactly what UBI would do, it would debase our currency, it would make large swaths of low-level jobs completely unfillable, it would cause countries like China to dump their US bonds, it would cause inflation as we've never seen before, it would be the furthest thing from fiscal responsibility as it comes.

I look at your insult and just laugh honestly.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on May 6 2021 07:49am