Quote (IceMage @ Jun 23 2020 10:36am)
Lawl.
It may just be more a function of Trump's unwillingness to take responsibility for anything. He may have given the okay, but he doesn't want to be held responsible for it.
I understand thinking of Trump as a complete idiot, because he is in many ways, but in others he's not. Trump fired the last SDNY US attorney after he had multiple phone calls with him, something Preet Bharara said never happened once with Obama. Of course Trump knows who runs SDNY, because they are the district who would prosecute anything related to Trump's organization, and who prosecuted Cohen and investigated Trump's inaugural fund and Trump's personal attorney.
Because he doesn't see himself as responsible, at least not directly. It's a reflection of how he perceives the situation. Barr wanted him gone, and he obliged. In Trump's mind, that is Barr's decision.
Why would Trump suddenly be shy about exercising his authority when he has shown zero compunction against using it (even when it appears to benefit him personally) in the past?
Quote (theCrossbones @ Jun 23 2020 10:30am)
So would this be equal to Obama’s AG firing a US Attorney to protect HRC?
No, I think this a misinterpretation of Barr's reasons for firing Berman. The Democratic party believes that mass protests which benefit them politically or which they support are good, despite and irrespective of the dangers posed by Covid-19. They simultaneously believe that religious funeral gatherers (in this case, Jews) are bad because they spread Covid-19. The position is ridiculous at face value, obviously hypocritical, and a source of great resentment among religious groups and conservatives. Berman aligned himself with that end of the spectrum at the same time that Barr was publishing a letter critical of the aforementioned obvious hypocrisy. If Berman's position was tenuous before, this is the figurative straw that broke the camel's back.