I am asking for evidence to support your position and you tell me "fu". Is this the best you can do to convince people?
So I guess you're here to give sermons and not to hold conversation. I think you got the whole point of a "forum" wrong

#staysafe

you already made your choice
you said "You opened this thread with a youtube video. Do you really think I bothered to read beyond post #0......"

the only perceivable advantage the face diaper offers is seconding as a scarf in the blistering cold wind
that's it. end of story.

the cootie19 has never been isolated (a pure sample) it might as well be imaginary and mask zombies larping order followers.

Government in Ireland Forced to Admit Covid-19 Does Not Exist
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UDnx6xZ7q3uP/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Koch's postulates are the following:

The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms.
The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.
The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.
The microorganism must be reisolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch%27s_postulates

I did say that, and now you are hiding behind that quote to avoid having to provide some sort of evidence for your perspective, giving you the moral justification to keep spouting bullshit in the thread.
Regardless, I said that to prevent having to read up until where I commented. It does not mean I do not read anything you say during our discussion. But (again) I am happy to admit I will not entertain youtube and bitchute as proof as they are bs platforms full of bs. They direct their content to users like you because quite frankly it is how they make their money.

/e Have you read your own wikipedia reference? Even Koch doesn't support his own postulates after discovering some illnesses that were so elementary while not meeting his requirements. You're using criteria formed AGES ago when we did not have half of half of half of half of half the information about microscopic things compared to now. (I again see an interesting analogy with 2nd amendment supporters while the bases for this amendment have long ceased to exist, but I assume this opinion will be labeled as TDS so let's just not go there)

This post was edited by Forg0tten on Dec 31 2020 08:33am

my argument is already posted as you said "you opened this thread with a youtube video. Do you really think I bothered to read beyond post #0......" why should i read any thing you write your already made your decision. you reject content while never reviewing it. you were the first one to say FU i just returned the sentiment.


you find this appropriate? is this ok in belgium?
Belgium Police Violence Against A Family That Didn't Respect ChineseVirus Lockdown Restrictions
https://www.bitchute.com/video/STXTsgkBSyri/

So your argument is "you said you will not read anything I say so I will not give an indepth argument", even after I said I only referred to the previous pages and elaborated that it was due to your massive lack of sources?
...
...
Case closed, I guess lol.
Enjoy remainder of 2020.

the sum of my argument is "u get what you give" "got it?"

if at some time you do become reasonable thee are plenty of things posted in this thread for consideration.

happy new year

I have given you enough scientific evidence to believe to contrary and you just throw it all out of a window because of a youtube video or a youtube-like video.
Comon man, this has nothing to do with an eye-for-an-eye kind of thing. You've got nothing to support your perspective and you damn well know it. I invited you multiple times to give me the evidence you have.
All you've got is a bunch of anecdotal stories unbacked by evidence and a whole lot of youtube videos and bitchute videos. You think my refusal to spend my time watching bogus youtube videos has anything to do with being unreasonable?
Come up with research. Youtube has absolutely nothing that is even remotely close to research. It can help you understand things at times and there are interesting vision throughout every subject that any book has to offer by now, but it could never pose as research or proof. That's just not what youtube is.
Did we seriously decline to a level of whether or not youtube is a viable source for scientific research in order to determine whether or not face masks are effective? Fuck my life, what am I doing with my free time.

the sum of my argument is "u get what you give" "got it?"

if at some time you do become reasonable thee are plenty of things posted in this thread for consideration.

happy new year