d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Earth Is Flat > Gods Work
Prev14647484950111Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 17396Replies: 1102Track Topic
Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
#471
Jun 11 2016 03:27pm
Quote (Qodesh @ 11 Jun 2016 16:09)
According to the truth and the Word of God which is the truth, yes



Does this exclude the extra gospels?

Member
Posts: 3,862
Joined: Mar 19 2010
Gold: 4.00
#472
Jun 11 2016 03:41pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 11 2016 05:17pm)
How do you know what Jesus says



I did my studies hehe =)


Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 11 2016 05:27pm)
Does this exclude the extra gospels?


The dead sea scrolls had the book of enoch, therefore, it must have been really important for them to include it together. I believe the book of Enoch, Jubilees, and Jasher are good. I myself know for a fact that the first book of enoch is the Word inspired of God but not the 2 others (enoch), they are counterfeits. As for jubilees and jasher, I have not read them yet. I don't know what to think about apocrypha, I havn't did any research on it nor have read it. I know there is 7 deuterocanonical books added by the clergy of Catholic church which are not the Word of God

I believe the book of enoch is a book destined for us. A book of end time prophecies and I clearly understand why they removed it from the bible, it explains in details the watchers, and our world! In fact, Jesus Himself quoted from the book of enoch and in etiopia if im right, they have it in their bible

This post was edited by Qodesh on Jun 11 2016 03:43pm
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
#473
Jun 11 2016 04:05pm
Quote (Qodesh @ Jun 11 2016 03:41pm)
I did my studies hehe =)


So be specific
Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
#474
Jun 11 2016 04:25pm
Quote (Voyaging @ 11 Jun 2016 16:26)
Not sure what you're asking. Are you asking which things we observe require relativity to describe?

There's this, for one: http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_analysis_for_the_Global_Positioning_System#Relativity



"What good is it for" is a more simple way of asking I guess.

I understand in relativity Einstein hypothesized that time dilation would be more severe in orbit of much larger masses.
If what the DoD is telling us about their GPS system is honest, then the atomic clock variation as a function of distance to center mass, would be more or less proof of our describing factors of gravity.

What does the DoD publicize to be the cause of "[in]accuracy of 5 to 10 meters?" I have been made aware through my employment of someone who repaired GPS receivers called "BFT" that the capability is within a few mm of accuracy and it is intentionally diminished for civilian reception.
There was also an absurd quirk that made them quite difficult to set up which involved syncing the time with a BFT that was already online within .9 second accuracy.
i never connected this experience to my new found skepticism of the existence of satellites, gonna have to see if I can find these secret TMs.



This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 11 2016 04:26pm
Member
Posts: 77,670
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
#475
Jun 11 2016 04:34pm
48 pages, wtf kind of effortless shit is this
Member
Posts: 52,044
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
#476
Jun 11 2016 05:05pm
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 11 2016 05:25pm)
"What good is it for" is a more simple way of asking I guess.

I understand in relativity Einstein hypothesized that time dilation would be more severe in orbit of much larger masses.
If what the DoD is telling us about their GPS system is honest, then the atomic clock variation as a function of distance to center mass, would be more or less proof of our describing factors of gravity.

What does the DoD publicize to be the cause of "[in]accuracy of 5 to 10 meters?" I have been made aware through my employment of someone who repaired GPS receivers called "BFT" that the capability is within a few mm of accuracy and it is intentionally diminished for civilian reception.
There was also an absurd quirk that made them quite difficult to set up which involved syncing the time with a BFT that was already online within .9 second accuracy.
i never connected this experience to my new found skepticism of the existence of satellites, gonna have to see if I can find these secret TMs.
https://www.viasat.com/files/assets/Government%20satcom%20systems/bft_in_hmmwv_604x400_001.jpg


Civilian "C" gps has been offline for years. Everyone now uses military "A" gps. I've personally seen inaccuracies as much as 200 feet in military gps.
Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
#477
Jun 11 2016 05:41pm
Quote (Santara @ 11 Jun 2016 18:05)
Civilian "C" gps has been offline for years. Everyone now uses military "A" gps. I've personally seen inaccuracies as much as 200 feet in military gps.


Are you sure your guys didn't just turn off the tracking so they could head into the FoB for lunch without the commander seeing?
xD

It says on GPS.gov the diminishment procedure or "SA" was thrown out in 2000 to never return. But in 2011 I was still being taught at Detection systems school that it was in effect.
I could reasonably attribute that to lack of updates, as far as information went, we were still trained on Geneva illegalized mine dispensers.

There is still a 3.5 meter inaccuracy horizontally across the board that's peculiarly attributed to atmospheric effect.

Looks like
I'm going to need to see the original GPS research and execution schematics, if I am going to entertain it's orbiting possiblity honestly

Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
#478
Jun 11 2016 07:05pm


Supposedly an institute of technology in Japan had NASA launch a cubesat to be visible on earth
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2214498/Tiny-orbiter-shine-like-star-transmit-Morse-Code-messages-sky.html







Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
#479
Jun 11 2016 07:12pm





So has anyone seen the Fitsat-1 from the earth's surface?




Definitively yes, at a minimum, low orbit satellites have been executed by non governmental agencies.
Though, it only managed to stay in orbit for a year.
It begs the question, how is perpetual orbit achieved?
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
#480
Jun 11 2016 07:12pm
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 11 2016 07:05pm)
Supposedly an institute of technology in Japan had NASA launch a cubesat to be visible on earth
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2214498/Tiny-orbiter-shine-like-star-transmit-Morse-Code-messages-sky.html

http://i.imgur.com/LM1DSVc.png

http://i.imgur.com/l5FR16h.png


Yeah, there's a million pieces of technology we use that depends on a spherical earth.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14647484950111Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2024 d2jsp  Contact