damn. you might be correct there

This is what passes for intelligence in your mind. Holy shit.

Somalia is a failed socialist state.

Falsely declaring Somalia is the result of my ideals does not mean you refuted my points. Very basic fallacies.
Bringing up Somalia in this manner is an anti-intellectual excuse to dismiss and avoid consideration and legitimate points.
Thats a childish response fitting an elementary school playground, not an intellectual refutation of libertarianism.

Nope its a libertarian paradise, what legitimate points have you ever made?
Name a few of these "legitimate points".

You don't appear to have the ability or honesty required to properly analyze whether my points are legitimate or not.
There have been countless threads where you pull this same shit.

I just explained how what you said is not a refutation at all and is in fact a basic fallacy.
You dont want to deal with it so you deflect and pretend I never make legitimate points. More anti-intellectual behavior.

"Nope its a libertarian paradise' does not refute what I just said either.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Aug 15 2021 05:10pm

Can you name a place that implemented libertarian ideals that had a good result? Because everywhere I can think of that implemented capitalism also implemented massive protectionist policies and had huge central governments the whole time.

Are we posting in pard or playing dodge ball?

You are the one deflecting because you can't mentally compete and don't want to analyze or admit what happened here.
Just play it off and appeal to your delusions about the past. Much more comforting than admitting you are deeply wrong and inferior after running your mouth so much.

Lets try to make this more relatable to you.
Imagine typing up paragraphs of points and someone responds "You should move to north korea. North korea is your ideological paradise!' and then they claim that refutes what you said.
Do you think that would be accurate and legitimate?

I asked you to make some points, you keep dodging.
Your system is literally the base form of society and we always abandon it as soon as feasible because its simply not efficient to keep in place, outcomes are always worse without a revenue stream and centralised control.

I have already made a large number of points and you responded with anti-intellectual garbage and deflections.

No you haven't, feel free to post some though if you think so.