Quote (cambovenzi @ Aug 15 2021 04:52pm)

He did call out Fauci for lying tho, so he must be evil. No one should question that guy, he can do no wrong. All hail Emperor Fauci!

Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Aug 15 2021 06:22pm)

If you watched the exchanges with Dr. Fauci honestly you would see that Paul was lying out his ass. At one point he asked if Dr. Fauci wanted to apologize for the millions dead, and when Fauci called him out on it and cited there being no evidence of human manipulation in the virus Paul was all like "I never said you helped create it".

Rand Paul is a giant cuck and it speaks volumes that you will so vehemently defend him.

Quote (cambovenzi @ Aug 15 2021 05:24pm)

Nah you are the dishonest loser here. Rand Paul accurately criticized Fauci on a number of things and you want to pretend he was lying.

Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Aug 15 2021 06:25pm)

Nah, Paul blatantly lied and scientifically illiterate rubes like you ate it up, because you care about the team label more than fact checking.

Quote (cambovenzi @ Aug 16 2021 01:49am)

You've gone from these MUST be done by the state or they wouldn't exist to posing some potential problems and questions when you were shown to be clearly wrong.
You've lost the argument.

Is the current state system without problems or potential downsides for some people?
No, there are countless examples of government-caused horrors, problems and inefficiencies.


People not being stolen from to fund very expensive and economically unfeasible roads and powerlines to a remote farm is a good thing.
If I build a house on a remote mountain should you be forced to pay for my roads? Why?

The people in the area can decide what kind of roads they want to pay for or build.
There is a long history of roads without taxation.
Bemoaning the fact that people might choose to not fund some types of roads to some places does not eliminate the possibility of private or voluntarily paid for roads.


Then people can choose to pay for a service. Radical.


That is not a unique problem to security that isn't funded by theft.
What if a small country is faced with organized crime known as another state which overwhelms their security?
Perhaps you are unaware of obscure examples of that happening throughout history.

The potential for a stronger force to overwhelm a weaker one does not erase the existence and possibility of private/voluntary security.



This is an unsubstantiated and faulty claim. People have been settling on and developing land for thousands of years. Forcing people to pay for infrastructure is not required.

Lets say it was accurate for a second. People chose to not to inhabit some land. Ok cool.

The government is currently preventing people from continuing to expand and settle uninhabited areas in vast swaths of the western United States.


There is nothing precluding the possibility of people voluntarily funding a defense department.


1. Speculation. Competing organizations can and do exist.
2. Similarities existing does not mean its the same as government, nor does it mean it doesn't exist.

Holding a voluntary society or program up to a utopian standard of perfection does not mean government programs are the only possibility.

Quote (cambovenzi @ Aug 15 2021 05:27pm)

Keep up the dishonest misrepresentations and caricatures. Whatever you have to tell yourself to pretend you are on the right side of this.

Quote (Plaguefear @ Aug 15 2021 06:30pm)

Everything you want to do is just worse than what is in place, you and the other 6 people who want the freedom to live in one place with no infrastructure and be murdered by the first warlord to arise already have the option to move to somalia and experience that.

Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Aug 15 2021 06:31pm)

Nah, not a dishonest misrepresentation. It was plain as day. Paul made a clear insinuation that Fauci funded research that may have created Covid, he was immediately called on it and backtracked.

Paul is a cuck who thrives on actively misrepresenting things even when faced with people who are far more knowledgeable than him.

Quote (cambovenzi @ Aug 16 2021 08:31am)

Low IQ caricatures and cliches are not good replacements for arguments, intellect and consideration.