im trying to explain an inside joke to you genius.

no one's making fun of him for having a job, or even the job itself, its a joke on his unnecessary childish withholding of info.

idiots have been coming into pard for a decade now that refuse to answer simple questions like "what do you do" or "what state do you live in" or even "are you american". its a childish behavior akin to "ive got this toy, no one else gets to play with it". fit only for mentally defunct edgelords who have so large of an ego they think it will be used against them, rather than just spur on normal polite conversation, and are then mocked, confirming to them they acted smartly.

Keep it up buddy, keep chasing those retarded woke points. But you're digging your own grave in this debate hehe.

Did you know that wahamen you mentioned is Aus second largest cattle producer. Your progressive buddies, so concerned with climate change can exactly tell you how they feel about people that literally don't give a shit about the planet and keep pushing that meat production despite being filthy rich already.

That's another point, you're always moaning a screaming whenever rich people are mentioned especially rich republicans and now we catch you praising a filthy rich wahamen and clapping like a fucking seal because: It's a wahamen. FFS bugger off

You're one despicable hypocrite but yeah what to expect from the "progressive" left, lol

I don't care about inside jokes. What people do is irrelevant. Why try to defend something that detracts from the conversation?

do you realize this is ironic to say?

I don't think you understand what irony is.

Person A defending Person B on the grounds of attacks against Person B being anti conversational, when the attack itself is for Person B being anti conversational.

I think you use "that's not irony" as a default statement, because most people don't know what irony is. I do tho.

Was I defending a person or was I pointing out the uselessness of comments of a personal nature being made?

replace "defending" with "pointing out blah blah blah" and it's still ironic. the ironic aspect is the duality of anti conversational, not your statement inherently.

for someone who claims i dont understand irony u seem not to.

This is the sort of circular logic that allows the worst aspects of society to continue.

oh strange, i thought it wasn't irony. strange u dropped that. just strange.