Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 11 2021 11:03am)
The current push to regulate social media companies is only necessary because of their monopolistic market position which Big Tech is increasingly abusing... and not for economic gain, but rather to shape politics and the public discourse. Also, let me preemptively remind you of the fact that Amazon intentionally deplatformed Parler, a potential Twitter alternative, at the exact moment when there was a short window of opportunity for such an alternative to reach critical mass (in the wake of conservative outrage over Trump's twitter ban).
Also, nice deflection from the low IQ meme crossbones had posted.
Corporations are people, they have a right to shape public discourse if they have the ability. That's just free speech, and is something conservatives actively argued for for decades, and not something I personally accept. If conservatives actually believed in no government interference, they wouldn't see the government as a viable solution to big companies actively shaping the conversation. Additionally, fossil fuel companies actively shaped the discourse around fossil fuels for decades through political donations and media advertisement. Didn't see conservatives bitching then.
It's plainly obvious if you pay attention that American conservatives don't give a shit about companies shaping the conversation or abusing monopolistic positions as long as they agree with what is being done. The second they don't believe in what is being done, they call for regulation.
This part doesn't matter because of the previous, but I'll add it for clarity: Amazon deplatformed Parler because Parler was a center for violent rhetoric and hate speech, and did not have sufficient moderation. They had many many posts calling for political violence that the moderation team was explicitly aware of and did not have the capacity to deal with.
This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Jul 11 2021 10:17am