Quote (fender @ 27 Mar 2018 18:17)
stop the presses! someone made an honest mistake, was made aware of it, immediately admitted they were wrong and set the record straight - 'hurr durr... fAke NeWs!'
that's the 'standard' of people who get regularly called out for being blatantly wrong and INTENTIONALLY dishonest, but just act like it never happened and move on to the next alternative fact. hilarious...
holy centralist propaganda, the seizure of catalan finances by the madrid government to prevent said misuse has cost multiple times of what they ALLEGED catalonia illegally used to fund the referendum - but ofc the money itself was never actually the issue, it was about finding reasons to arrest political opposition. not that the logic of 'the only way of preventing votes in the future is to assault the people peacefully participating' makes any sense to begin with.
concerning majorities and minorities we can't actually know how it currently is in catalonia considering the background of the recent elections, but i would not at all be surprised if there still is no true majority for it. anyway, thanks for supporting my point that the 'nationwide anarchy' argument in order to justify the authoritarian crackdown has no merit whatsoever...
You accuse me of propaganda, when I'm either posting facts with sources or quotes from catalan politicians and documents, which I can link to if necessary... meanwhile, you keep coming with more fake news, like the "seizure of catalan finances by Madrid to prevent said misuse, resulting in massive losses for Catalonia".
First of all, the intervention took place a couple of weeks before the referendum (aka, half a year ago)... it's not like it's an old time measure that has caused a huge impact in the catalan economy. Secondly, it was not "to prevent said misuse", it was a protocolary reaction to the catalan government refusing to send their weekly documents on their financial status.
Quote (dro94 @ 27 Mar 2018 19:21)
Zark's argument is essentially that Catalan agreed to a constitution so can never leave unless the Spanish government allows it through a vote of their own. The logical extrapolation of this is that no signed treaties can be reneged on without big brother's approval. Scotland agreed to be part of the UK in the past and a referendum was still legally granted for Scottish self determination without the UK government or the UK as a whole voting on it. We held a referendum on being a part of the EU in 2016, which funnily enough was borne of a 1975 referendum that happened around the time the Spanish constitution was crafted - things changed for us since then and I imagine that's the same for the people of Catalan.
The referendum was illegal but repeated attempts of Catalonia to have a legal referendum granted by the Spanish government were refused. What did you really expect? Significant economic regional powers, especially those with a strong sense of tradition and history, will eventually determine their own fates, what's happening now is delaying the inevitable.
There is no big brother, Spain and Catalonia aren't, and have never been, separate entities. The UK has no constitution that stopped Scottland from having a referendum, so the case isn't comparable. Our constitution can be amended through a nationwide referendum to allow this vote, so there is a legal way out. Almost 30% of spaniards voted for parties in favour of such a change in the last nationwide elections so, while still far from being a majority, it's not impossible that such a change could happen in the future.
You claim the government should have accepted the catalan government's demands, but that is simply not a decision the government can make on their own, even if they really wanted to. It would be illegal under the constitution for them to accept such a demand. There are no "legal referenda" involving national sovereingty that the government can grant to the regions; the government doesn't have such a power (in the UK perhaps, but not here). Sure, they could have held a referendum to change the constitution, but again looking at how only 30% of people voted for parties in favour of such a change, the way things were at the moment, or things are right now, there would be literally no chance of the change going through. It would be a political suicide to organize a referendum you know you are going to lose.
If the constitution is change to favour the interest of the separatists, then I will not oppose a referendum, but until then I will not support it at all, as I will always stand by the rule of law.