Quote (Kippet @ 11 Nov 2020 20:20)
Most states forbid electors from voting contrary to the popular vote of that state.
The majority (33) do, that is correct. Still a lot of states with a lot of power held in the hands of their electors though.
Quote (Thor123422 @ 11 Nov 2020 20:22)
Here's the thing though, if no state had a law against bribing the electors and then Donald Trump just straight-up bribed to the electors to vote for him that would be totally legal and legitimate based on the criteria you gave.
Not everything legal is legitimate, the way we do things has certain assumptions built into it that aren't expressly written into the law. I like the idea of that the votes cast on Election Day matter not just the electoral votes. Even though the process officially Works through the electoral votes we have a massive campaign with tens of billions of dollars being spent for a reason, it's not just for show.
When you ignore this in your analysis of what is and isn't a legitimate tactic you end up coming off like a 13 year old who just had their first civics class.
Neither Trump nor the RNC could afford to bribe electors. Dems spent over double what the Republicans did this campaign cycle. They're the rich ones who can afford the bribes.
The fact is though, it is 100% illegal to bribe an elector. That's literal election fraud and is a federal felony. It's enough to deseat a sitting President AND remove a President-Elect's candidacy.
Perhaps you should go back to your first civics class prior to making such flimsy examples.
This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Nov 11 2020 10:26pm