d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Election Day Megathread
Prev1458459460461462534Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Nov 11 2020 10:15pm
Quote (Kippet @ 11 Nov 2020 20:11)


I read it and am aware. Again, it's nothing but ceremony. The vote is cast on December 14th and counted the same day. If no candidate reaches 270, the House and Senate are called upon for an emergency session, and the House elects the President, the Senate elects the Vice President. This is fact, feel free to look it up.

That challenges can be made in January are immaterial, for the most part. Once the vote is cast on December 14th, the winner is given all transition powers according to the US Constitution. If Biden wins on the 14th, and Trump attempts to "block" transition team authority, then we are faced with illegal and unconstitutional action on behalf of the President, which brings up a host of other issues.

As I said, you need to look at the entire process.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Nov 11 2020 10:16pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Nov 11 2020 08:03pm)
It's both legitimate and legal. Biden can use the same means. It's not a coup. A coup is an illegal and typically violent attempt to take power.

But I'd hesitate to attribute the idiotic words of Levin to Trump or his Campaign.


At what point does it become illegitimate? If state legislatures decided to vote for Mondale instead of Reagan in 1984, do you think the American people should be fine with that? I think you can abuse the system from a legal perspective but really fuck with the underpinnings of this country.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Nov 11 2020 10:17pm
Quote (thundercock @ 11 Nov 2020 20:16)
At what point does it become illegitimate? If state legislatures decided to vote for Mondale instead of Reagan in 1984, do you think the American people should be fine with that? I think you can abuse the system from a legal perspective but really fuck with the underpinnings of this country.


"The American People" do not determine how states cast their electoral votes for President. That power resides upon each individual State.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 11 2020 10:18pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Nov 11 2020 10:17pm)
"The American People" do not determine how states cast their electoral votes for President. That power resides upon each individual State.


And unless the state has a law mandating a specific vote it's up to the individual electors
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Nov 11 2020 10:19pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 11 Nov 2020 20:18)
And unless the state has a law mandating a specific vote it's up to the individual electors


Agreed. Hence how hostile some PaRDians get over the mere mention of "faithless electors".
Member
Posts: 1,304
Joined: Jul 8 2012
Gold: 0.00
Nov 11 2020 10:20pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Nov 11 2020 10:18pm)
And unless the state has a law mandating a specific vote it's up to the individual electors


Most states forbid electors from voting contrary to the popular vote of that state.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 11 2020 10:22pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Nov 11 2020 10:19pm)
Agreed. Hence how hostile some PaRDians get over the mere mention of "faithless electors".


Here's the thing though, if no state had a law against bribing the electors and then Donald Trump just straight-up bribed to the electors to vote for him that would be totally legal and legitimate based on the criteria you gave.

Not everything legal is legitimate, the way we do things has certain assumptions built into it that aren't expressly written into the law. I like the idea of that the votes cast on Election Day matter not just the electoral votes. Even though the process officially Works through the electoral votes we have a massive campaign with tens of billions of dollars being spent for a reason, it's not just for show.

When you ignore this in your analysis of what is and isn't a legitimate tactic you end up coming off like a 13 year old who just had their first civics class.
Member
Posts: 1,304
Joined: Jul 8 2012
Gold: 0.00
Nov 11 2020 10:22pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Nov 11 2020 10:15pm)

As I said, you need to look at the entire process.


That is exactly the point that everyone is making when they say that Biden won the election. Lol. Thanks for making my point there, chief.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Nov 11 2020 10:23pm
Quote (Kippet @ 11 Nov 2020 20:20)
Most states forbid electors from voting contrary to the popular vote of that state.


The majority (33) do, that is correct. Still a lot of states with a lot of power held in the hands of their electors though.

Quote (Thor123422 @ 11 Nov 2020 20:22)
Here's the thing though, if no state had a law against bribing the electors and then Donald Trump just straight-up bribed to the electors to vote for him that would be totally legal and legitimate based on the criteria you gave.

Not everything legal is legitimate, the way we do things has certain assumptions built into it that aren't expressly written into the law. I like the idea of that the votes cast on Election Day matter not just the electoral votes. Even though the process officially Works through the electoral votes we have a massive campaign with tens of billions of dollars being spent for a reason, it's not just for show.

When you ignore this in your analysis of what is and isn't a legitimate tactic you end up coming off like a 13 year old who just had their first civics class.


Neither Trump nor the RNC could afford to bribe electors. Dems spent over double what the Republicans did this campaign cycle. They're the rich ones who can afford the bribes.

The fact is though, it is 100% illegal to bribe an elector. That's literal election fraud and is a federal felony. It's enough to deseat a sitting President AND remove a President-Elect's candidacy.

Perhaps you should go back to your first civics class prior to making such flimsy examples.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Nov 11 2020 10:26pm
Member
Posts: 92,977
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 11 2020 10:24pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Nov 11 2020 09:58pm)
If they went to the states and convinced the states to change electors it would all be legal, but it would not be legitimate, it would not bein the interests of Democracy, it wouldn't be in the interests of the country, and it would be reasonably described as a coup.

I don't see every legal path as legitimate. That's where our hang up is.


Frankly i have zero issue with a mass faithless electors strategy being called a coup. And luckily i don't think that can or will happen.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1458459460461462534Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll