Quote (SanduLungu @ Jun 24 2021 10:57am)
I feel because it's statistics about minorities you want to have context and knowledge to pull the conclusions in predetermined directions.
Statistics is worthless without context. If I got in my car and accelerated for a full minute, would you come back and tell me "HA, 100% OF THE TIME THE CAR GOT FASTER! YOU REALLY THINK BREAKS EXIST? THE STATISTCS SAY OTHERWISE!" No, of course not. That would be dumb. But that is the exact thing you are doing when you argue race statitics without context.
For instance, we know that the underlying rate of drug use is pretty much equal across races, yet minorities get arrested at far higher rates. We also know that for equal crime with the same set of facts a black person is far more likely to get convicted than a white person, and will get a harsher sentence than the white person would have. And we know that once you're in jail once you've lost a massive amount of opportunity which makes it more difficult to do anything but crime when you get out.
All of this compounds on itself to create a situation where the legal system causes more crime in the long run in minority communities, starting from an equal position.
This is all very important context to evaluating statistics. If you just look at the statistics you can come away saying "blacks are more prone to crime because they're black" when in reality it's "blacks are prone to more crime because they are specifically targeted by the legal system with more convictions, harsher punishments, and lack of opportunity".