I wonder what the no evidence excuse changes to..

I'm just going to pretend he doesn't exist at this point lol.
I've gone through almost every link hes posted on this topic.
Tried to get him to understand that none of this is evidence of a mass fraud conspiracy.

Multiple people looked into the shit he posted, and then accurately criticized it for not being evidence enough to carry weight in court.
His response to this every single time has been to just respond like they're attacking personally rather than the information or criticizing the case hes trying to make.
Not to say there haven't been personal attacks, because obviously there have.

Every time someone critiques it "youll see!!!" and something about CNN or Democrats.

He just needs to chill out a bit. Til then hes just a KGB Spook.

This post was edited by Mangix on Nov 11 2020 04:46pm

Like I said, confirmation bias game is stronk.

So the courts will be considered bias when confirmed. I thought that might be the next move

playing right into it

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 11 2020 04:52pm

Straw man game also stronk.

Intentionally distorting statements like this to score points just shows how weak your case is.

I swear... white hats are literally gonna crack this right open for Trump team and you guys will still be trying to catch up.

The FBI agent who was recorded intimidating a witness to recant his sworn statement of election fraud... They found his Twitter..

I mean here's the Twitter page to the fed who was caught intimidating a witness to change his sworn statement..



https://twitter.com/TitansFanJeff

Count every vote! Especially all the ones filled out with bs information.

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 11 2020 05:07pm

Regarding the first part, we agree. Though "fraud" and "irregularities" should both be included.

On the second part, you cannot conflate "proof" and "evidence". Somebody saying something is "evidence". There is no "proof" of anything until the "evidence" has been vetted. In order for the evidence to be vetted it has to be examined and either accepted or denied by a judge and/or jury.

Been a while since I posted in this thread, so going to say again: The election is not final, electors have not cast their votes, and votes are not even completely counted. The election is not over or decided until the process finishes. As it appears right now, Biden will win, which is fine. However, after the process completes, it may turn out that Trump will win, which is also fine.

Sit back, enjoy the show, and try to avoid trolling each other too much. The system is working. Rejoice!

You seem a lot less angry now. Thats good. This is a much more reasonable take than Jere

By this logic the election isn't over till members of the House and the Senate count the electoral college votes in January. Is there any value to saying "However, after the process completes, it may turn out that Trump will win, which is also fine."? Unicorns might exist, I don't know. They could. I don't know though. I don't think we should sit around and theorize about it though, probably a waste of time.