how can you argue against trump lawyers admitting in court no voter fraud lol

Sure, I guess I'll do this again.. You're getting an omission of events so that the information can be spun.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/10/i-was-in-philadelphia-watching-fraud-happen-heres-how-it-went-down/#.X6qodQWrWkM.twitter

and... we're getting closer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrlgOIyZWIs

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 11 2020 04:36pm

So if I'm reading it correctly. His proof that election fraud happened is that people weren't allowed into the room?

Not familiar with government procedure, are you? It's there for a reason

Yeah, but thats not proof of election fraud, thats proof that procedures weren't followed...

Watched the video as well. 200k ballots went through a machine instead of through human hands and could totally be valid, but just need to have humans go back through them.

Again where the fuck is the fraud?

It's in the sworn affidavits from the thousands of election officials across the nation that you ignore. No worries, the court will determine that it shouldn't have been.



This post was edited by Jere on Nov 11 2020 04:37pm

but there were people in the room lol they argued that in another court case and the answer was "there was a non-zero number of bodies in the room"

If you watched all 500 hours of video he's posted your brain would melt enough that you would see the fraud.

When courts tell you that it's true. You will find another reason to believe that it is somehow not true.

If there is enough evidence to prove it in court I will believe there is fraud.

But until then I'm just going to keep pointing out that nothing you posted constitutes proof and you only harm your own cause by claiming there is something for which you currently have no evidence.