d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
Prev14445464748424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 5,385
Joined: Aug 19 2007
Gold: 15,053.50
Nov 3 2021 05:06pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 3 2021 06:53pm)
"look at how she was dressed" is generally a victim-blaming comment that attempts to draw blame away from the guilty party in what is universally considered wrong: rape.

I don't feel this is the same. While murder is indeed universally wrong, it is entirely up for debate whether Kyle's actions constitute murder or justified killing.

I would never say that anyone ever "forfeits" the right to defend themselves, but whether they can make a legal claim that their actions are justifiable under the law is another matter.

Conversely, rioters indeed have a right to their life, regardless of the mayhem they're engaged in. But that doesn't mean that the person who puts a stop to them has no legal basis to cause them harm.


So let's establish a premise for no. 1, if someone is attacked physically they are the victim, and if they defend themselves they are still the victim of the situation all told. If you look at it under the pretense of Kyle being the victim of being attacked is what I was getting at there. Having violence thrust on you is universally wrong if it isn't in self defense. Blaming the "victim" as in saying well what did he expect to happen showing up at xyz place, seems at least somewhat comparable. Draws blame from the party that initiated the violence right?

Number 2, let's change that up then, where is the line where people forfeit the legal right to defend themselves?

This post was edited by Crye on Nov 3 2021 05:07pm
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Nov 3 2021 05:07pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Nov 3 2021 01:55pm)
putting himself in a potentially dangerous situation is not an act of aggression or a crime.
there were thousands of people who put themselves in that dangerous situation and all of them retain their right to self defense if and when they are aggressed upon.


sweet the mostly peaceful protestors can start shooting at cops.
Banned
Posts: 20,182
Joined: Mar 1 2011
Gold: 0.05
Warn: 70%
Nov 3 2021 05:27pm
Quote (sirthom @ Nov 3 2021 03:58pm)
Not claiming anything other than the state he isn't white.

Overreact much?


So what ethnicity do you believe him to be?
Banned
Posts: 20,182
Joined: Mar 1 2011
Gold: 0.05
Warn: 70%
Nov 3 2021 05:34pm
Quote (kenw @ Nov 3 2021 03:39pm)
Blacks and race traitors are cut from the same cloth according to White nationalists. He should have been at home to begin with, but his white rage consumed and spurred him into action. Most of the protests were peaceful, so you are sounding quite ignorant right now.


So your claiming kyle is a white nationalist and his white rage consumed him in to putting out a dumpster fire being pushed in to a gas station provoked race traitor rosenbaum to attack kyle the white nationalist?

This is what you believe correct?
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 3 2021 05:45pm
Quote (Crye @ Nov 3 2021 05:23pm)
I'm glad we were able to reach some common ground, but you lost me at the bolded section here.

Super fudd mentality, if you're into skeet shooting and duck hunting by all means you do you, but that is not at all what the second amendment is about and it doesn't matter what anyone thinks of when they hear gun owners, if a person is acting within the confines of the laws this matters zero. I don't think you were making this point regarding any legality standpoint but it does shine a bit of light on what your feelings are towards the second amendment and the right to self defense as a whole.

As I read through the rest of the thread I also see more doubling down on the open carry escalation of violence rhetoric which is just plain silly at this point and seems to be being used throughout the thread (by multiple people) to insinuate that it may somehow in some small way justify people commiting actual acts of violence against the person carrying, which is obviously ludicrous.

Then what irritates me even further is the implications and outright admission that you think anyone who disagrees with the "escalation of violence" thing you're pushing as "basic knowledge" or "day one information" is somehow less responsible as a gun owner than you, as if that automatically means they don't take firearms training or safety seriously. That my friend is absolutely absurd. It's all coming across as if you're almost trying to virtue signal by using your arbitrary beliefs as a measurement for what constitutes a good firearms owner from a bad firearms owner. What you use your firearms for or want firearms ownership to mean to people has no bearing on that distinction.

Feel free to correct me if I am mistaken on your views but you are coming off this way imo


We simply disagree on how important certain aspects of 2a are. I don't discount them but I'm sure were a ways apart. And I'm sure u believe that by putting your foot down you'll pretect 2a longer. I think honest concessions where they make sense can preserve it longer.

Simple question. Do you think Americans will have the right to own firearms in 200 years? And if not how do we keep them the longest?

This post was edited by thesnipa on Nov 3 2021 05:45pm
Member
Posts: 24,012
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,554.14
Nov 3 2021 05:48pm
Quote (aaron9999 @ Nov 3 2021 06:27pm)
So what ethnicity do you believe him to be?


Ashkenazi, possibly even a Khazar.
Member
Posts: 5,385
Joined: Aug 19 2007
Gold: 15,053.50
Nov 3 2021 05:49pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 3 2021 07:45pm)
We simply disagree on how important certain aspects of 2a are. I don't discount them but I'm sure were a ways apart. And I'm sure u believe that by putting your foot down you'll pretend 2a longer. I think honest concessions where they make sense can preserve it longer.

Simple question. Do you think Americans will have the right to own firearms in 200 years? And if not how do we keep them the longest?


I think there is a fair chance that America as it exists today won't exist in 200 years.
Ultimately I don't know if they will or not. I certainly would hope so.
We keep them the longest by not negotiating any more rights away whatsoever, there has been far too many concessions made already. It's pretty clear that it won't magically stop at some point, but be whittled away bit by bit. I don't see how one could think otherwise.

This post was edited by Crye on Nov 3 2021 05:50pm
Banned
Posts: 20,182
Joined: Mar 1 2011
Gold: 0.05
Warn: 70%
Nov 3 2021 05:51pm
Heres the new released footage from the FBI. Kyle was offering medical attention before being shot st and chased down.

https://mirror.fro.wtf/reddit/post/3224755
Member
Posts: 36,937
Joined: Oct 20 2007
Gold: 48,650.00
Nov 3 2021 05:58pm
Quote (aaron9999 @ Nov 3 2021 07:51pm)
Heres the new released footage from the FBI. Kyle was offering medical attention before being shot st and chased down.

https://mirror.fro.wtf/reddit/post/3224755


I am certain that if Kyle didn't have an AR15 he would be dead.
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 3 2021 06:02pm
Quote (Crye @ Nov 3 2021 06:49pm)
I think there is a fair chance that America as it exists today won't exist in 200 years.
Ultimately I don't know if they will or not. I certainly would hope so.
We keep them the longest by not negotiating any more rights away whatsoever, there has been far too many concessions made already. It's pretty clear that it won't magically stop at some point, but be whittled away bit by bit. I don't see how one could think otherwise.


Firstly on ur last post while I'm regularly a pompous person I was more drawing a line between what I prescribe and what I deem far more irresponsible behavior ala what Kyle did. 2 people are dead im not going to pretend he didn't do anything wrong even if i don't see him as guilty of murder.

Secondly while I do NOT want to go the way of Australia they are a case that shows certain aspects of gun ownership can be retained even if firearms are effectively removed. They still have hunting. And again I don't see that as a good model and it's stupid hard to get a gun there. Etc.

Overall I respect self defense specifically home defense or property defense very much. But I specifically undervalue guns as a means to defy tyranny more than most gun owners. We've seen what a government can and will do, guns in the hands of people or not, during this pandemic and even before.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Nov 3 2021 06:03pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14445464748424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll