This study was measuring "in-group bias", not "my group vs whites bias". If the blacks/asians/hispanics were feeling warmer about other ethnicities than the oh-so-evil racist white conservatives, then their score of in-group bias would have to be lower.

If one is stuck in the ridiculous liberal parallel world where all conservative whites are cryptoracists who feel fervent hatred toward all non-whites, and the score for that is an 11.62, how come the score for the bias of non-whites is even higher than that? They either have to hate the whites more than the whites hate them, or there is significant racial prejudice between the various non-white groups. (For example blacks feeling more animosity toward asians than non-liberal whites do.)

Your alternative explanation is contradicted by the numbers once you think about it.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 9 2021 03:56pm

Yes.

Can't blame them, white people are pretty awful in general. The white liberal tries to be everyone's savior and the white conservative is selfish beyond redemption. Frankly, the only whites that are redeemable are Catholic.

Maybe if you're willing to pay an arm and a leg. In America, the facilities are WOEFULLY understaffed and the overall care is HORRIBLE. I'm not sure what country you live in but I would never send my family to an American facility unless the ratio of nurse to patient care was adequate. I've seen first hand how awful the care is in multiple states.

What about the Jews? Don't you consider them to be superior to everyone else?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 9 2021 03:57pm

I can't relate with being that gay.

Obviously it varies. Likewise, the care that an elderly person is going to get from their adult child varies depending on the resources that child has. An adult child with their own responsibilities (their own kids, job, sleep) can't be available 24/7.

Across the spectrum of how many resources a person has, professional facilities will fall to a higher level of care than trying to let a regular busy person squeeze in elder care between his other life chores.

from 2019, but still highly relevant:

ftfy

Voter id isn't inherently racist, it should certainly be a requirement. The only problem is i dont trust the motives of the people who push for it as they're the same people who have a habit of shutting down voting booths in negroes neighborhoods. Outside of that illegals should certainly not get the same rights as citizens in terms of voting.

well duh. voter ID laws as a general concept are obviously not inherently racist, but that's not the argument. when you look at the US, where 25% of black people simply don't have a valid photo ID, introducing such laws would lead to racist outcomes, completely changing the voter demographic, and that's the point of all those new republican voting laws: limiting, inconveniencing, and disenfranchising minorities as they tend to vote democrat.

instead of changing their platform to appeal to more voters, republicans rig the system: from voter purges, closing polling places in populated areas, limiting voting times, opposing election day as a holiday, extreme gerrymandering, to sabotaging the USPS. it's a clear strategy to keep voters away, and they're not exactly being subtle about it... then again, why would they, when their supporters either share their undemocratic motives, or are just so gullible that they fall for their transparent excuses and baseless claims about systematic voter fraud...

This post was edited by fender on Apr 9 2021 08:46pm