Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 23 2021 12:51pm)
our local tribe was polled and it came out like 70% to keep our highschool named "indians", and that was constant for decades, they kept polling area native tribes.
but a state directive killed it, so we're no longer the indians, now the pumas. fucking lame.
indians in wisconsin = nearly extinct, only a small habitat
pumas in wisconsin = extinct, no permanent habitat
I think what some of these sensitivity crusaders are missing is what do these words mean to me people and do they associate them with some sort of insult/trying to degrade someone or not. When I think of the word Indian in the context of America, I basically see some group people, varying by tribe, geography, etc. that were the natives to this continent pre colonial time. Many died, many killed, some assimilated. Some of my knowledge is influenced by movies and books and American history education. I have never thoughtwhen I heard this word, and similar ones like redskin or whatever that they're designated as insults or to degrade these groups.
Like i'm trying to place myself in the shoes of some racist KKK type. Would I be thinking, fuck yeah lets name all of these major sporting teams after groups we absolutely hate and want to eradicate. Like what? to me that's illogical, if I was such a person I would never want to empower a group by giving them such positive publicity. If you're an anti-native racist living in Cleveland do you want to be celebrating the 'Indians' at the local bar when they win a playoff series?
This post was edited by ofthevoid on Jul 23 2021 11:10am