who is "they"

To be fair, O'Keefe winning lawsuits over whether his antics rise to the level of legally-provable slander or defamation are not an exoneration of his deceptive editing tactics.

The adults are talking.

Forget his name, google things like 650k ballots+nevada+election+fraud

Probably give you an exact name with a little sifting.



Must find any reason to invalid possiblilty. Why not just double check?

Suspect af when people don't have any interest in ensuring the election results were not tampered with..

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 10 2020 06:41pm

I'm totally unopposed to double checking. However, I don't hold O'Keefe in any regard.

Interesting.

Well, fucking well...

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1326323334800437248

Coup!

Biden leads by 20k in WI, 12k in GA, and 14k in Arizona, although with quite some votes still outstanding, and lately having leaned Trump. So Biden's lead in AZ will end in the range of 10-12k votes. In total, this adds up to around 44k votes.

https://alex.github.io/nyt-2020-election-scraper/battleground-state-changes.html




Biden is on track to win the EC and the tipping point states by the same margins as Trump did in 2016 - and back then, Democrats and the liberal media wouldnt shut up about the fact that "Trump only won WI/MI/PA by 80k votes, he doesnt have any mandate, his win was a pure fluke".

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/12/01/donald-trump-will-be-president-thanks-to-80000-people-in-three-states/



I think they're referring to the margin of absolute votes, not percentage wise. Which is a bogus statistic inflated by this year's huge turnout.
A 5% margin in the popular vote is nothing unusual. Since 1960, half the presidential elections were won by a larger popular vote margin than that (in 64, 72, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96 and 2008).

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 10 2020 06:48pm

Claims to be 4 more hours of footage interview and additional footage of the fed trying to coerce...

So not only are we all about to lose faith in our elections, electors, media/tech, but we are also going to lose it the FBI even more...

Doesn't seem like we are headed towards a good place no matter what more and more..

I expect media starts to find criminal history or past on the person. They would rather run that than retract first.

Apprantly he says further in his interview that Washington Post never contacted him at all before running the story

How the did they know he recanted without talking to him?

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 10 2020 07:14pm