Quote (fender @ 28 Mar 2021 18:43)
restrictions were lifted effective march 10th. that's 18 days ago. also, that graph is kinda pointless without context. compare it with national trend at least.
here you go:

ggnore
Quote
most importantly: have texans started not wearing masks and given up social distancing, or has their behaviour largely not changed, just that it's not officially mandated anymore?
Are you arguing that these restrictions do not have to be mandated and can be effective enough (in Texas of all places) as voluntary recommendations?
Quote
i thought covid was the ONE issue you wanted to try not to be a lazy right wing hack and rather side with science and reason for a change?
Science on covid mitigation measures is fairly clearly saying that blanket lockdowns are only marginally more effective than very targetted lockdowns or intelligent contact, trace and isolate efforts (while causing far higher collateral damage).
Quote (fender @ 28 Mar 2021 23:22)
the countries that did best are those that implemented harsh measures early.
This only pertains to countries which were able to successfully pursue an elimination strategy. And such a strategy hinges on geographic and social preconditions which are satisfied neither in Europe nor North or South America.
However, among comparable countries which were not able to get community spread between their borders down to zero, the long-term trajectory of countries which imposed harsher and earlier countermeasures is not better than that of countries which followed a more lenient approach.
Quote
if you want to see how succesful a true laissez-faire approach is just look at sweden or brazil - and you won't have a "point" anymore...
Since the fall, Sweden has been dowing similar or even better than Germany/France/Italy/the UK, and that's in spite of less restrictions. They made one crucial mistake at the onset of the pandemic when they didnt protect their elderly enough. This, not their lack of lockdowns or mask mandates, caused their high mortality during the first wave last spring. It is completely unfair how this one mistake is, to this day, held against them by lockdown proponents.
For example, during the fall/winter wave, Germany failed just as miserably to protect its nursing homes and as a consequence had a period with higher per capita mortality from covid than even Trump's U.S. But for obvious reasons, neither the international press nor Germany's "camp lockdown" hold it against Germany's government and its covid strategy, while the exact same mistake is still weaponized to discredit the Swedish approach.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Mar 28 2021 05:42pm