d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Youtube Video Thread
Prev1439440441442443716Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Feb 3 2019 05:53pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Feb 3 2019 04:50pm)
so if their venue of choice is Twitter, that means they actually have a right to the president - on twitter

no wonder all you had was trash-posts when adressing me
rofl:



actually if TRUMP'S venue of choice (which it has been) is twitter and he uses it to declare policy as President he opens it up to be a first amendment issue since it's a public forum

sorry buddy. You have no legal leg to stand on and Jones is bye bye. Fully legal and constitutional
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 3 2019 06:02pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Feb 4 2019 01:53am)
actually if TRUMP'S venue of choice (which it has been) is twitter and he uses it to declare policy as President he opens it up to be a first amendment issue since it's a public forum

sorry buddy. You have no legal leg to stand on and Jones is bye bye. Fully legal and constitutional


if TRUMP'S venue of choice (which it has been) is twitter and he uses it to declare policy as President, and twitter blocks people access to participate in that discussion - the wrongdoing is identical to one in the lawsuit, hence identical rights violation

imbecile #2 self-destructed
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Feb 3 2019 06:04pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Feb 3 2019 05:02pm)
if TRUMP'S venue of choice (which it has been) is twitter and he uses it to declare policy as President, and twitter blocks people access to participate in that discussion - the wrongdoing is identical to one in the lawsuit, hence identical rights violation

imbecile #2 self-destructed


any way to get Helical posts without the extra scoops of cringe? or do we just wait til some pard angel gets you 20'd so we can get a break for a while?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 3 2019 06:07pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Feb 3 2019 06:02pm)
if TRUMP'S venue of choice (which it has been) is twitter and he uses it to declare policy as President, and twitter blocks people access to participate in that discussion - the wrongdoing is identical to one in the lawsuit, hence identical rights violation

imbecile #2 self-destructed


Uhh, you dont have a right to Alex Jones
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 3 2019 06:18pm
deep state judge wanted to own Drumpf but instead got 2 soyboys bodied

thats gotta sting
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Feb 3 2019 06:29pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Feb 3 2019 05:18pm)
deep state judge wanted to own Drumpf but instead got 2 soyboys bodied

thats gotta sting


You're factually legally and constitutionally wrong and Jones will stay banned on top of that

let me know how all that winning goes for you
Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 3 2019 09:50pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Feb 3 2019 05:17pm)
https://media.giphy.com/media/13l7w7N4Vr1dw4/giphy.gif

You've made Alex Jones (violator of site rules) getting held accountable for his actions so much more enjoyable

Alex Jones is responsible for Alex Jones getting banned from sites that are not owned and ran by him

Perhaps he should follow rules that he agrees to follow by signing up or pull himself up by his bootstraps and figure out a way to successfully distribute his content in a way where he is the one making the rules


Quote (Beowulf @ Feb 3 2019 06:07pm)
Get them banned you won't hear me complain

They provide a service. They are under no obligation to allow those you like to stick around or to ban those you dislike

It's their reputation on the line when they enforce or don't enforce their rules.

Don't like it? Don't use it. You have no right to it. Your friends and political heroes have no right to it.


I don't like Alex Jones at all, I never agree with his conspiracies or videos. However, if what he was banned for is actually what I've heard what he got banned for. There is something wrong with that. Is it a private service? Yes. You're right, they can do what they want. But that doesn't mean that it's still the right thing to do. When individuals silence voices, there should be an alarm in that. I don't recall Alex Jones ever inciting others to commit violence or anything like that. Overall, I don't use Twitter anyways.


Similar topic.

I don't think YouTube will be the main source of videos within the next 5 years or so. With all of the content creators upset with how the monetization works, and the flagging of videos. A lot of content creators hate youtube now, with the constant censorship, people really can't express themselves freely and videos get flagged for bogus reasons all the time. YouTube uses formulas and restricts users profits and viewcounts if you don't align with the agenda they have created. It's limiting, and flawed.

This post was edited by GLYC123 on Feb 3 2019 09:53pm
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Feb 3 2019 10:03pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Feb 3 2019 05:03pm)
fool in denial

tweets provided of him extensively responding to the #FakeNews censorship bregades cries show he was the frontman behind deciding wether to stand tall or cave in

fakenews CNN scum Loliver Darcy was publicly calling jack out on twitter for not caving to CNN's ban demands initially

but dont let these FACTS stop you from parroting your low iq "Company CEO not only wasnt at the forefront of biggest ban decision on his platform, but wasnt even in the know on the details" fairytale


Jack Dorsey has a million more important things to think about than another right-wing nutter who violated Twitter's rules.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Feb 4 2019 12:17am
Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 4 2019 01:47pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Feb 4 2019 01:17am)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9xt80zOKsA


Those Antifa guys are nuts.

I wish Law Enforcement officers required them to not hide their faces. That would stop a large part of the animosity aspects when they destroy stuff.
And just what you want, now those guys are holding rifles. You know, because carrying rifles is a great thing to do at a protest where everybody's emotions get charged up.

I saw another video of them doing that down the streets of, I think Portland?? A squad of like 40 bicycle police pulled up on them.

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1439440441442443716Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll