Quote (LA-Leviathan @ Aug 27 2020 11:59am)
None of this matters. He can shoot him in the head, the leg, 80 times or once. You don't like the laws, go change them, too bad you are too inadequate to affect anything. He is a civilian ignoring direct orders from an officer while under arrest and on top of all there is a standard of probable assumption. Which was passed way before he decided to turn his back to the officer and reach into the vehicle. Again, you have zero idea how the real world works because youre a useless lefty. No one cares about your opinion.
I'm actually quite right leaning......
There is no law that one can change that would allow/prohibit shooting someone unjustifiably and attempting to murder them. A cop with a jumpy trigger finger and poor decision making under pressure does not justify firing 7 rounds. I've got a few friends that are in law enforcement, and a couple that are Chicago PD in the midst of all this bullshit. You might find their opinions interesting about this type of shit - what is a justified shooting, how they're trained, etc.
I really hope you aren't involved in law enforcement in any way, shape, or form. This isn't the wild west. You don't shoot first and ask questions later. This isn't a "let God sort them out" situation.
I've done a little research and there is conflicting reports on weather he was reaching for a knife in his car or not.
I'll type this very clearly for you as you don't seem to comprehend things well.......
The shooting is/was justifiable if he was reaching or going for a knife. Not 100% clear if that's the case.