Quote (fender @ 27 Mar 2018 14:42)
ah i see, so it isn't really violence if you don't end up in the hospital for a lengthy time...
it's funny how comfortable some people are with obvious police brutality, as long as it's against people they disagree with. i guess this political tribalism is even more widespread than i anticipated.
political arrests based on blown up bogus charges? sure, go ahead. charging police for kicking people sitting on the ground, beating peaceful protesters with batons, shooting into crowds, shoving them down stairs, dragging women by their hair, and attacking elderly? nah, their injuries were too minor and they deserved it because the supreme court wanted to set an example (based on the centralist interpretation of the constitution catalonia was basically blackmailed to agree to eight decades ago) and prevent a region from determining their own future.
what a refreshingly healthy democracy you have. no, ofc spain is not north korea, but this is still a very concerning development - if you're in favour of democracy that is...
very unfortunate how even somewhat reasonable people lose any sense of perspective, democratic and even basic human values when the team mentality kicks in...
Fine, keep sticking to subjective opinions (like the interpretation of what is violence and injuries, which is something anyone can argue about and defend from different points of view) and ignore the objective facts (like why the separatists have neither visited the injured or taken legal actions against the police, which is undeniable, no matter where you stand).
And you keep repeating that Catalonia was forced to accept the constitution, which is complete bogus:
-First of all, the constitution referendum was held in 1978 (we will celebrate it's 40th anniversary in december

), over a year after free elections... not "eight decades ago", which would be during Franco's rule.
-Second of all, the Constitution was elaborated by 7 democratic politicians, from different parties... and one of them, Miquel Roca, was from Puigdemont's catalan nationalist party. And all articles had to be unanimously approved.
-Thirdly, Catalonia was the region where the constitution got the 2nd most support (95%). Meanwhile in the castilian regions, like Extremadura, Cantabria, La Rioja, Madrid, Castilla-LaMancha and Castilla-Leon... there was much less support. Why? because it was precisely the spansh nationalist right wing that called for a boycott against a consitution that advocated for "far too much for decentralization" and was "too appeasing" to regional nationalisms.
-And lastly, the basque regions of Euskadi and Navarre supported the constitution far less than Catalonia ("only" around 75%), because ETA's political branch opposed, since they considered it wasn't enough to please their separatist goals. If the catalans thought the constitution wasn't good enough for them, they should have showed less support, like the basques did. Nobody forced them to vote anything.
We will see about bogus blownup charges when the trial is done. I don't see what interpretation you can give to the law in order to not see sedition when you are disobeying the Supreme Court's orders, or not see embezzlement when you are spending the public budget on illegal activities, but then again I'm not a law expert (and afaik, neither are you). We will have to see what will happen now.
e: and what are you basing yourself on in order to accuse me of only supporting these kind of police actions when they are against people I disagree with? I'm against all illegal protests in free democratic countries, bound to a rule of law, that offer legal and easily available means to peacefully protest, no matter the ideology behind them.
This post was edited by zarkadon on Mar 27 2018 08:07am