Quote (brmv @ Apr 28 2013 10:59pm)
congratulation, you soon will reach the copy/paste proficiency of 'poulgaragr'
why do you misuse the term 'logic' when you clearly do not comprehend what it means?
Then why don't you change the word logic and use your own word but keep the same question? Then at least you will be able to sleep at night.
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Apr 28 2013 11:25pm)
Not quite the same thing. He is hypothetically acknowledging the existence of specific YouTube videos while rejecting the existence of others. If you tell the world that there is no such thing as YouTube videos, then at least the developed world will all think you're full of it.
If you tell the world that there is no such thing as a god, then most people won't believe you, sure. But if you tell people that there's no such thing as Yahweh, then 5 billion people will agree, since there are only 2 billion Christians in the world. If you tell people that there's no such thing as Allah, then 5.4 billion people will agree.
"The devil is in the details", I'm afraid.
You're right in saying that if I tell the word there is no such thing as Yahweh, then 5 billion people will agree. However, if 2 billion people tell the world that there is such a God as Yahweh, + the billions of other people that have lived all through history then surely the 5 billion people will agree.
You can't dismiss the accounts of historical claims along with the claims of the here and now. The sheer number alone amounts to more than 5 billion. This is true because the population has been living their respective generation for more than 2000 years with roughly 100 years each. 20 generations telling the single generation of the here and now that there is such a God as yahweh.
Now try to claim that 5 billion people won't believe.