d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > A Few Challenges From The Qur'an And Me > Stick To The Topic
Prev1434445464774Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 24,639
Joined: Jun 27 2008
Gold: 0.00
Aug 17 2012 12:01am
Where do these pictures fail?



Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Aug 17 2012 12:03am
What does Arp have to say about the isotropic distribution across the sky of distant gamma-ray bursts and supernovae? The cosmic microwave background?
Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Aug 17 2012 12:05am
Quote (simpleforce @ Aug 17 2012 12:01am)
Where do these pictures fail?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6f/CMB_Timeline300_no_WMAP.jpg/800px-CMB_Timeline300_no_WMAP.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/37/Universe_expansion2.png/241px-Universe_expansion2.png


I don't know what you're trying to prove with those pictures, but here's a good website that shows how there's no center to the big bang, if that's what you're implying with the pictures:

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
Member
Posts: 24,639
Joined: Jun 27 2008
Gold: 0.00
Aug 17 2012 12:06am
Quote (AEtheric @ Aug 17 2012 06:05am)
I don't know what you're trying to prove with those pictures, but here's a good website that shows how there's no center to the big bang, if that's what you're implying with the pictures:

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html


Those pictures are observations, not assumptions.
Member
Posts: 24,639
Joined: Jun 27 2008
Gold: 0.00
Aug 17 2012 12:09am
Quote (AEtheric @ Aug 17 2012 06:05am)
I don't know what you're trying to prove with those pictures, but here's a good website that shows how there's no center to the big bang, if that's what you're implying with the pictures:

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html


Right. That only makes sense. But from B and A, the speed at which they are relatively moving apart are different. Put a planet C in there and it will make sense. Let me try to edit those pictures so i can make sense
Member
Posts: 10,780
Joined: Jul 22 2011
Gold: 655.00
Aug 17 2012 12:09am
Quote (simpleforce @ Aug 17 2012 02:06am)
Those pictures are observations, not assumptions.


assumptions made from observations.
Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Aug 17 2012 12:11am
Quote (Voyaging @ Aug 17 2012 12:03am)
What does Arp have to say about the isotropic distribution across the sky of distant gamma-ray bursts and supernovae? The cosmic microwave background?


Well, all stars are not distributed isotropically but rather fractally. Gamma rays can issue from AGN (Active Galactic Nuclei) or quasars that are ejected from AGN's.

"Galaxies are not distributed randomly throughout space but are instead arranged in an intricate "cosmic web" of filaments and walls surrounding bubble-like voids. There is still no compelling observational evidence of a link between the structure of the cosmic web and how galaxies form within it. However, such a connection is expected on the basis of our understanding of the origin of galaxy angular momentum: disk galaxies should be highly inclined relative to the plane defined by the large-scale structure surrounding them. Using the two largest galaxy redshift surveys currently in existence (2dFGRS and SDSS) we show at the 99.7% confident level that these alignments do indeed exist: spiral galaxies located on the shells of the largest cosmic voids have rotation axes that lie preferentially on the void surface. " - Detection of the effect of cosmological large-scale structure on the orientation of galaxies
Ignacio Trujillo, Conrado Carretero, Santiago G. Patiri

Survey of the nearby universe maps the distribution of about 75,000 galaxies (small blue dots). The placement of each galaxy in the radial direction is proportional to its distance from the Earth (which is located at the intersection of the two wedges), and its angular position (or right ascension in hours of arc) corresponds to its location along a thin strip in the sky. The galaxies clearly trace a network of filamentary structures.




As for the CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background), if you look at my post that contains all the studies, it's more likely an InterGalactic Medium that is radio noise, stellar winds, birkeland filaments, double layers etc.



Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Aug 17 2012 12:11am
Quote (simpleforce @ Aug 17 2012 12:06am)
Those pictures are observations, not assumptions.


Um, no. Those pictures are assumptions.
Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Aug 17 2012 12:13am
Quote (Ylem122 @ Aug 17 2012 12:09am)
assumptions made from observations.


Interpretations made from observations with assumptions built into them to create hypotheses.
Member
Posts: 24,639
Joined: Jun 27 2008
Gold: 0.00
Aug 17 2012 12:13am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1434445464774Next
Closed New Topic New Poll