Quote (Landmine @ Dec 29 2023 01:56am)
I am personally not stating anything. The newpaper itself is making the claims that the articles written by John Solomon had bias and were intentionally misleading.
Quote
A February 2020 internal review by The Hill concluded that there were multiple flaws in Solomon's 14 columns about Ukraine and the Bidens, including omitting important details and failing to disclose that the sources used by Solomon were his own attorneys Victoria Toensing and Joseph diGenova—both close associates of Trump and his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani.[44][45]
What do you mean by "The facts stay the same"? I just told you that he skewed the truth to push his narrative and the newspaper that hired him came to that conclusion.
Edit: Also, as much as I would like to spend some time to go to the next article you linked, I think we can stop it here at this point. It is very time consuming to continue reading article after article to provide you with the reasoning as to why you were wrong. This is the exact issue I explained in my original comment:
Quote
It can only be done so many times before people give up and say fuck it because you can't do the basic research yourself.
This post was edited by umeshieee on Dec 29 2023 01:06am