They factually do not

On every site rules are vague and discretion is powerful for a reason

Feel free to hold the company and Jack accountable for your feelings by not supporting the product but none of us have a right to use it or deserve to use it

it's a product that is being offered. That's all it is

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/23/trump-twitter-block-ruling-court-public-forum-account

Knowing this, twitter's ban of ANYONE is the same first amendment rights violation, since people lose access to the feed of the POTUS in the same way

I've never had a twitter account and read Trump's tweets just fine all the time

next

try reading the post next time

the ruling states that peoples rights are violated because they lose the ability to PARTICIPATE in the public forum, not just read it

Maybe it was explained earlier, why is this relevant? The court case only exists because trump repeatedly claims his Twitter is used for official government communications

He as President is acting as President on twitter

something he is choosing to do including declaring policy in a public forum

He is free to not use twitter any time he wants and will be able to block anyone he wants in 2-6 years

changing subjects ?

you seemed so sure to say people have no rights on twitter

apparently both twitter ceo and clinton-appointee judge knew much betta after all

Trump is declaring public policy as President on twitter

that's actually first amendment related

You have no ground to stand on by comparing Jones and the President or rands and the President

People have no rights on Twitter, they have a right to the president no matter what venu he chooses.

so if their venue of choice is Twitter, that means they actually have a right to the president - on twitter

no wonder all you had was trash-posts when adressing me

you are an imbecile