d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > How To Get To Heaven When You Die
Prev1435436437438439487Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 7,251
Joined: Oct 9 2021
Gold: 4,661.71
Sep 14 2023 05:27am
Quote (TiStuff @ Sep 14 2023 01:03pm)
at the end of the day there are two competing views. special creation or naturalistic
i am reviewing the progress or lack of 'naturalistic explanation.
what have you learned about nebraska man?


A special creator is, correct me if I am wrong, omnipotent. So he could have done his magic through nature. He also invented nature, so why not.
Member
Posts: 46,912
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Sep 14 2023 05:34am
Quote (Modulok2405 @ Sep 14 2023 04:27am)
A special creator is, correct me if I am wrong, omnipotent. So he could have done his magic through nature. He also invented nature, so why not.


i dont argue that but you can if you want.
any progress on nebraska man?

This post was edited by TiStuff on Sep 14 2023 05:35am
Member
Posts: 7,251
Joined: Oct 9 2021
Gold: 4,661.71
Sep 14 2023 06:08am
Quote (TiStuff @ Sep 14 2023 01:34pm)
i dont argue that but you can if you want.
any progress on nebraska man?


1. I dont have any incentive to argue with that.

2. What I just googled in a quick not very deep search about Nebraska Dude:

Nebraska Man was a wrongly identified ape species based on a tooth found in Nebraska as the name would suggest.
That was corrected as soon as the mistake was identified as such and corrected in 1927.

Again, correct me if I am wrong with that info.
Member
Posts: 46,912
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Sep 14 2023 10:05am
Quote (Modulok2405 @ Sep 14 2023 05:08am)
1. I dont have any incentive to argue with that.

2. What I just googled in a quick not very deep search about Nebraska Dude:

Nebraska Man was a wrongly identified ape species based on a tooth found in Nebraska as the name would suggest.
That was corrected as soon as the mistake was identified as such and corrected in 1927.

Again, correct me if I am wrong with that info.


1. ya me neither. guess it becomes a non issue.

2. thats cool. you provided part of it. i wouldnt call this one a fraud though more like just bad science, over zealous i suppose?
the story shows what atheists can get away with. all based on a tooth a complete monkey man was created and published in science magazine
1922 after more digging it was found to be a pigs tooth and was retracted in 1927. for 5 years though it was "proof"

next is a fun article on whale 'evolution. its amazing what these people can get away with yet the creationist is the woo woo imagination person
Member
Posts: 7,251
Joined: Oct 9 2021
Gold: 4,661.71
Sep 14 2023 12:32pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Sep 14 2023 06:05pm)
1. ya me neither. guess it becomes a non issue.

2. thats cool. you provided part of it. i wouldnt call this one a fraud though more like just bad science, over zealous i suppose?
the story shows what atheists can get away with. all based on a tooth a complete monkey man was created and published in science magazine
1922 after more digging it was found to be a pigs tooth and was retracted in 1927. for 5 years though it was "proof"

next is a fun article on whale 'evolution. its amazing what these people can get away with yet the creationist is the woo woo imagination person


1. Yeah, that was never an issue for me.

2. What do you mean when you say atheists can get away with it? Its just a few guys, dude. How is this relevant? Who even said that they did this in the name of atheism? And even if they did, what significant about it?
Dont you see the insane double standard on your side? Do you know what religion got away with over the past thousand years or so?

Apart from the fact that none of this is relevant for the question wr both ask, its insane hypocracy on your side to call out those incidents to make a point about atheism.

Member
Posts: 46,912
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Sep 14 2023 06:45pm
Quote (Modulok2405 @ Sep 14 2023 11:32am)
1. Yeah, that was never an issue for me.

2. What do you mean when you say atheists can get away with it? Its just a few guys, dude. How is this relevant? Who even said that they did this in the name of atheism? And even if they did, what significant about it?
Dont you see the insane double standard on your side? Do you know what religion got away with over the past thousand years or so?

Apart from the fact that none of this is relevant for the question wr both ask, its insane hypocracy on your side to call out those incidents to make a point about atheism.


atheist science
scientists that promote atheism. like 'evolution/abiogenesis that is all just a random process that caused it all and you can see the lengths they go through to sell the idea. if you were true you should be outraged.
so? we only just started and discussed just a few 'atheist frauds/chit science. things look bad for the atheist that wants to argue science.
even atheist high priest dawkins is ready to accept ID (intelligent design)
Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design


Member
Posts: 2,286
Joined: Aug 20 2006
Gold: 186.16
Sep 15 2023 09:21pm
The only true God is the God of the Bible. Hundreds of fulfilled prophecies prove this. Christ's miracles prove this. His death and resurrection proves this. The fact that the Bible was written by 40 authors and many didn't know each other, YET it fits together as one book proves this.
Member
Posts: 2,286
Joined: Aug 20 2006
Gold: 186.16
Sep 16 2023 09:54pm
Please rate this thread if you haven't yet and please give it 5 stars if you think this topic is important.
Member
Posts: 2,286
Joined: Aug 20 2006
Gold: 186.16
Sep 17 2023 07:11pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Sep 14 2023 08:45pm)
atheist science
scientists that promote atheism. like 'evolution/abiogenesis that is all just a random process that caused it all and you can see the lengths they go through to sell the idea. if you were true you should be outraged.
so? we only just started and discussed just a few 'atheist frauds/chit science. things look bad for the atheist that wants to argue science.
even atheist high priest dawkins is ready to accept ID (intelligent design)
Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoncJBrrdQ8


Hopefully, he will turn to the Lord Jesus to save him before he dies
Member
Posts: 46,912
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Sep 17 2023 10:33pm
Quote (xfrodobagginsx @ Sep 17 2023 06:11pm)
Hopefully, he will turn to the Lord Jesus to save him before he dies


dawkins is/was? one of Gods most outspoken 'enemies. he has lived long enough to see every thing he believes fall and
the path to salvation is still open. i have to believe that, peculiar feeling how the spirit makes one care about their enemies.



Quote (Modulok2405 @ Sep 14 2023 11:32am)
1. Yeah, that was never an issue for me.

2. What do you mean when you say atheists can get away with it? Its just a few guys, dude. How is this relevant? Who even said that they did this in the name of atheism? And even if they did, what significant about it?
Dont you see the insane double standard on your side? Do you know what religion got away with over the past thousand years or so?

Apart from the fact that none of this is relevant for the question wr both ask, its insane hypocracy on your side to call out those incidents to make a point about atheism.


ok lets keep going. i think we have only talked about three so far.
1. haeckels embroyo drawings
2. piltdown man
3. nebraska man

this next one is whale 'evolution
Whale evolution- A skeleton was found, missing all 4 legs and tail so the "skeptic" scientist drew in flippers and a fluke and said, proof of whale evolution. Later they found full skeleton and had to get out the eraser.( A criminal use of creative licensing by a empirical thinker?)
what we are going to find out? the absence of evidence seems to be the best evidence? just make up stuff to fill in the blank.

Quote
commentary from the video
Here is an example of scientists believing the false evidence produced by other scientists. Whale evolution is supposedly the best example of progressive, transitional mammal fossils from land to sea. Evolutionists are so committed to their theory that due to the absence of actual fossil evidence they just make it up. Sir Richard Owen commented in 1860 that there were so many whales, dolphins and porpoises in the sea, that there had to be an abundance of transitional fossils. He was a vocal critic of Darwin’s Transmutation Theory, promoted in the Origin of Species... so where are these fossils? Charles Darwin himself stated that in his day the fossils were absent, he hoped that they would be found in the future, a billion fossils later and his followers have to invent the lineage.

Scientists Convinced by False Evidence From Other Scientists! Whale Evolution - Dr. Carl Werner


This post was edited by TiStuff on Sep 17 2023 10:34pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1435436437438439487Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll