d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Earth Is Flat > Gods Work
Prev14243444546111Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
Jun 10 2016 10:44pm
Quote (Voyaging @ 10 Jun 2016 19:38)
No Newton was not right and no Special Relativity is not that simple.


Ok ok
Special relativity =

Small electromagnetic interactions between particulates which form matter
THEN
Gravitational interactions between large structures of matter.

Right? At some point the size change makes it free from retardation and suddenly subject to magic?

Correct me if I'm wrong




Member
Posts: 53,598
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 5,388.33
Jun 10 2016 10:45pm
Quote (remco6 @ Jun 10 2016 08:42pm)
wouldn't work, in his narative you would just be giving him mind altering drugs orputting him in a mind control simulator to confuse him between reality and your imaginary world.


lmfao
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 10 2016 08:44pm)
Ok ok
Special relativity =

Small electromagnetic interactions between particulates which form matter
THEN
Gravitational interactions between large structures of matter.

Right? At some point the size change makes it free from retardation and suddenly subject to magic?

Correct me if I'm wrong


kek

This post was edited by majorblood on Jun 10 2016 10:46pm
Member
Posts: 63,054
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Jun 10 2016 10:47pm
Quote (Qodesh @ Jun 11 2016 12:00am)
The Mudra (Hand sign) used during Lotus position is used to represent satan's number: 666
Also, the sold out ones are using this same sign as well as the one eye symbolism

http://i63.tinypic.com/2m47u37.png
http://i66.tinypic.com/103bia0.jpg
http://i64.tinypic.com/5yswee.jpg


I love how a bunch of photos in those images you can't even see their hands or they're making a completely different hand sign.

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 11 2016 12:44am)
Ok ok
Special relativity =

Small electromagnetic interactions between particulates which form matter
THEN
Gravitational interactions between large structures of matter.

Right? At some point the size change makes it free from retardation and suddenly subject to magic?

Correct me if I'm wrong


No.

Relativity + Quantum mechanics explains everything that exists at all sizes and speeds, but as of yet has not been unified

Newtonian mechanics is incorrect at all sizes and speeds.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Jun 10 2016 10:49pm
Member
Posts: 53,598
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 5,388.33
Jun 10 2016 10:50pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Jun 10 2016 08:47pm)
I love how a bunch of photos in those images you can't even see their hands or they're making a completely different hand sign.



No.

Relativity + Quantum mechanics explains everything that exists at all sizes and speeds, but is just barely incomplete

Newtonian mechanics is incorrect at all sizes and speeds.


Newtonian mechanics is only incorrect in a negligible way in non-relativistic scenarios
Member
Posts: 63,054
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Jun 10 2016 10:52pm
Quote (majorblood @ Jun 11 2016 12:50am)
Newtonian mechanics is only incorrect in a negligible way in non-relativistic scenarios


Negligible for practical usage, sometimes.

It's entirely incorrect in explaining the ontology of the world, which is what we're discussing.
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 10 2016 10:52pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Jun 10 2016 10:52pm)
Negligible for practical usage, sometimes.

It's entirely incorrect in explaining the ontology of the world, which is what we're discussing.


It's incorrect in the most pedantic way.
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Jun 10 2016 10:53pm
Quote (Voyaging @ 10 Jun 2016 20:52)
Negligible for practical usage, sometimes.

It's entirely incorrect in explaining the ontology of the world, which is what we're discussing.


I wanna get on ur tology, bb
Member
Posts: 63,054
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Jun 10 2016 10:56pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 11 2016 12:52am)
It's incorrect in the most pedantic way.


What do you mean by this?

Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Jun 11 2016 12:53am)
I wanna get on ur tology, bb


My tology is rock hard for you to get on.
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 10 2016 11:01pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Jun 10 2016 10:56pm)
What do you mean by this?

My tology is rock hard for you to get on.


When you look at typical speeds the errors are on the order of 0.0000000001%. I did the calculation for a person walking 10 m/s on a train going 5m/s and the error in the person's total walking speed went down to 1x10^-15 m/s. For the vast majority of systems it is "correct", as "correct" as we can ever get in science.

If you're talking in overly technical terms, yes, it's incorrect all the time for every application, but then so is every theory ever proposed, including quantum mechanics and relativity.

We actually can't apply an exact solution of any quantum mechanics equation ANYWHERE in the real world. It's always approximations based on the Schrodinger equation.
Member
Posts: 63,054
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Jun 10 2016 11:10pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 11 2016 01:01am)
When you look at typical speeds the errors are on the order of 0.0000000001%. I did the calculation for a person walking 10 m/s on a train going 5m/s and the error in the person's total walking speed went down to 1x10^-15 m/s. For the vast majority of systems it is "correct", as "correct" as we can ever get in science.

If you're talking in overly technical terms, yes, it's incorrect all the time for every application, but then so is every theory ever proposed, including quantum mechanics and relativity.

We actually can't apply an exact solution of any quantum mechanics equation ANYWHERE in the real world. It's always approximations based on the Schrodinger equation.


Do you have any reading/sources on that?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14243444546111Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll