Quote (Voyaging @ Mar 24 2016 02:12am)
Inaction with regards to a particular system still necessitates action in some other system. There's no such thing as global inaction for a human. E.g. if you're not donating money to buy mosquito nets, you're still performing some other action instead.
On a related note, are you suggesting that the morality of a decision should not be determined by the consequences of that decision?
I have not brought up morality. I am simply saying that inaction does not make you guilty of the consequences of the actions of another. It may be amoral to not act, but it does not mean you caused the event to transpire.