You encourage and antagonize other people (myself included) to shoot up schools / do what Elliot Rodgers did.

Also using ad-hominem attacks calling me: a "mentally damaged virgin"

Proof here:
http://s30.postimg.org/l17vxfbb3/Vivienne_Is_Insane.png


Then, even after you were 10%'d and were granted access back to the PARD, you made disrespectful comments of the lowest demeanor to Widow making fun of his deceased wife. In fact, not only making fun of him, but saying that he WAS to blame because of his wifes' death. You're of the lowest low and how you think you have any ounce of credibility after this vitriol shitstorm of events is beyond me.



Yeah. You're the biggest hypocrite I've ever seen on any forum, and you should be ashamed. You have not, and I emphasize, NEVER portrayed one simple ounce of compassion to anyone, EVER. It's a disgrace to not only yourself, but to others. Have a nice day.

This post was edited by HighschoolTurd on Oct 6 2014 07:48pm

I wouldn't normally start off a post with a personal attack but I feel you are worthy of being called the most basal fuck posting in this thread. Why didn't humans wipe each other out before the revelation? Ever heard of human solidarity? How far would people have made it if they thought murder, rape, cannibalism, perjury etc. were OK? What if tomorrow it was somehow proven scientifically that there is no god? You'd be left with the same exact problems you had the day before, and would still need to carry on coexisting with your fellow man. Would you suddenly think fucking your sister or raping the chick you work with at mcdonalds was ok? Would you go start sucking off guys in back alleys because all morality was lost? I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if you'd suck at least 2 or 3 dicks after the loss of your divinely-granted morality, but you may be doing that as I type this. If the only thing that's staying your hand and governing your actions is some divine warrant you sir, are a sad person and require some deep introspection.

This is an ad hominem attack by the way. I ask you to provide proof of your allegation and instead you start raging out and throwing bullshit insults in order to discredit me. Just so you know what ad hominem attacks look like. Fucking hypocrite.

I am compassionate toward other forum members. Just because I have no empathy for you or Widow does not mean I instantly think everyone is as awful as you two are. I often show sympathy and compassion and am very helpful to those I call friends and those I don't yet know.

This post was edited by Scaly on Oct 6 2014 08:25pm

You've said that before and forgive me if you've explained why in this thread (haven't read it all), but why do you hate him? He's contributed a lot to his field and has done a lot of good at popularizing science with his books/discussions/lectures. I'm guessing because he's so outspoken against religion? I can understand why he'd be pissed that someone would misrepresent what was said in a film that wasn't even released yet though. I wasn't even aware of that happening or any of the details so i'll look into that one.



He's been pretty consistent with his posts. I don't see how he's "the biggest hypocrite" you've ever seen.

This post was edited by dark-soul on Oct 6 2014 08:45pm

he should stop spewing rubbish like this. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/print/2012/04/has-physics-made-philosophy-and-religion-obsolete/256203/

This post was edited by Gastly on Oct 7 2014 03:14am

Rubbish like what? He explains himself very well in this interview. Where are you having an issue?

It is normal for religious people so say their religion is greater than other religions. Lawrence Krauss is one of those guys.

"Philosophy hasn't progressed in 2000 years". What a tool lol. It hasn't gotten really good until the past two hundred years.

Maybe these scientists should brush up on their philosophy of science a little

I should start commenting on the death of physics because I have a liberal arts degree. Has much happened in physics since Democritus anyway? I'm pretty sure the past three thousand years of physical science has been his footnotes.

This post was edited by Skinned on Oct 7 2014 08:25am

Or you could read what he actually said instead of judging him based on the title of the article which is extreme paraphrasing.

You just bit the bait pretty hard.

I read the article and the guy seems to use a lot of poetry and analogies.. If he studied philosophy more maybe he would have more cogent arguments.

He isn't as bad as Dawkins. I like Krauss, he is just very pompous and talks outside of his experience a lot.