Quote (AEtheric @ Aug 17 2012 05:43am)
That's an amazing conclusion you've drawn, but, sadly, it's so vague and non-contentious that it doesn't really say anything. They are studies that disprove fundamental postulates of the big bang, such as the CMB being the IGM, no time dilations on quasars which is supposed to occur in an expanding universe, and intrinsic redshifts disproving the Hubble Relation which, the Hubble Relation when taken in reverse through time is the fundamental reason we believe a big bang happened.
all theories.
And wait ... are you saying the Universe as a whole is not expanding?