he's back with a multi

You've clearly never read de Tocqueville

I haven't.
Link the relevant part to his/her argument that Twitter is a government agency.

This has no bearing on the current argument.

Trump is not being targeted by the state to quell his speech. He is not being made unable to express his opinion in the public domain.

A private company has decided to refuse him service/membership of their platform.

Twitter is not the government, nor is it a government agency.

This post was edited by BannyMcBannerson on Jan 9 2021 01:17am

Twitter executives met with Democratic committees last week.

This was obviously the fucking reason are you comatose?

Got any evidence of government officials directing Twitter to ban Trump?


Edit: and again, you don't have a right to Twitter. Could be mistaken (I'm not a user), but I assume they state in their user agreement that they can suspend/block/delete your account for any and all reasons.

This post was edited by BannyMcBannerson on Jan 9 2021 01:37am

This evil is going to have blowback on you and all of your descendants. You shouldn't support it.

1. yes many of them publicly called for twitter to ban him

2. censorship doesn't have to be committed by government for it to be censorship

Why is censorship inherently bad in a private platform?
I was banned from d2jsp for years and i well and truly deserved it.
If you violate the rules of a private entity they should have the right to remove you from their platform and anything other than this would lead to sheer chaos.