https://www.thescotfree.com/usa/ohio-ag-asks-supreme-court-to-overturn-pa-ballot-ruling-gop-observer-challenge-to-be-heard/



I don't know that Rudy's ascertain "that they are all invalid" or what kind of "oversight" was missing is pretty vague. All this states is they will listen to the idea.

Those details are laid out in the sworn testimonies from election workers which I have posted either here or in that other thread in this sub.

Invalidate 800k ballots, or invalidate the count of those 800k ballots, meaning that they would have to be recounted (this time with better supervision)?

yea but there is no law that says.. If X person counted under pressure all votes after are "invalid"
thats Rudy's idea.
AND its not even proven that it happened.

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Nov 10 2020 12:03am

Missouri and Ohio aren't filing a suit, they're joining an already existing suit to reject mail-in ballots received after election day. The PA supreme court has ruled that they can be counted as long as they are postmarked, but the legislature has passed a law saying they must be received. This is only a few thousand ballots and will not be enough to swing the results.

The supreme court agreeing to hear the case is good if there's a real concern. There isn't a chance in hell that they will throw out 800k ballots without some supremely good evidence that there was severe tampering. Like video evidence, not just testimony.

which senate races? pa didnt have a senate race this year. house reps fell along the expected lines, additional fraudulent ballots in the cities wouldnt cause a change from whats expected there.

trump WH saying there is rampant voter fraud. GA/MI/WI/PA
not AZ of course.

It's only a few thousand ballots and then you factor in the invalid ballots brought in that are included in many of the sworn statements and included into the count in those statements then you overturn more than a couple thousand you start getting into these wild numbers which oddly numbers don't match up all over..



Could see it coming to, these aren't all being announced at the same time.

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 10 2020 12:14am

If you start making wild assumptions then you get weird results.

That's really all it is. You aren't being skeptical in your interpretation of events. You really should calm down, wait for real evidence, and let the courts settle it. Remember, Trump got more federal judges than any president in history, he has had control of the federal government for 4 years, has an army of Republican lawyers to settle it, etc. etc. If the courts say it's bullshit, it's bullshit because in this case Trump really has the home field advantage. Just give it time, and if the courts say there's no evidence, there's really no evidence.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Nov 10 2020 12:20am

What's your opinion on the part where donations to trump's legal fund go 60% to retiring campaign debt, 40% to the RNC, and then if there's leftovers from the 60% they go to the legal fund?

Does that not seem like one big last grift to you?