d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1423242334234423542365001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,149
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Dec 1 2020 11:34am
Quote (thesnipa @ 1 Dec 2020 17:37)
overall my reaction is give me a god damn break. for decades both parties have cheered on the outsourcing of rural american communities to bolster wall street bottom line profits and fill their election coffers with corporate donations.

the GOP comes along on a Trump wave and some pandering about caring about blue collar workers and then we get posts like this. they didnt give a flying fuck, they let it happen through GOP presidencies, senate and house control, and dozens of gubernatorial reigns.

so again, give me a fucking break man.


Of course the "chamber of commerce" type of Republicans is just as guilty. I never claimed otherwise. In fact, I despise the "old" GOP establishment.

Quote (Thor123422 @ 1 Dec 2020 17:58)
And all Trump did to change that platform was Pander for votes while cutting the job retraining programs that would actually help those people


Trump spurred or accelerated a voter realignment which brought (even more) rural and working-class voters into the GOP column. The party will of course try to keep these voters, which means that it will have to adjust its platform at least somewhat to accomodate the priorities and interests of these voters.

On top of that, Trump did his best to break up the neoliberal mantra that unregulated and unmitigated outsourcing, globalization and free trade are inevitable and should be wholeheartedly embraced. This line of thinking had dominated politics in both parties for over 25 years, if not longer. We cannot expect him to single-handedly achieve a complete paradigm shift on this issue in just 4 years, particularly since he had to fight against vested business interest and institutional resistance all the way.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Dec 1 2020 11:35am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 1 2020 11:39am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 1 2020 11:34am)
Of course the "chamber of commerce" type of Republicans is just as guilty. I never claimed otherwise. In fact, I despise the "old" GOP establishment.

Trump spurred or accelerated a voter realignment which brought (even more) rural and working-class voters into the GOP column. The party will of course try to keep these voters, which means that it will have to adjust its platform at least somewhat to accomodate the priorities and interests of these voters.

On top of that, Trump did his best to break up the neoliberal mantra that unregulated and unmitigated outsourcing, globalization and free trade are inevitable and should be wholeheartedly embraced. This line of thinking had dominated politics in both parties for over 25 years, if not longer. We cannot expect him to single-handedly achieve a complete paradigm shift on this issue in just 4 years, particularly since he had to fight against vested business interest and institutional resistance all the way.


Just more "Trump can't fail, he can only be failed"

Trump didn't push for anything that impacted the material well being of these workers. He pandered and made promises that he could never in a million years keep, and then pushed for policies that actively harmed those people.
Member
Posts: 92,978
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Dec 1 2020 12:10pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Dec 1 2020 10:55am)
Platforms are not static. Just because a party had x position 20 years ago doesn't mean them moving away from that position is invalidated because of the past.


Sure, so long as "moving away" is reality, and not just more pandering.

so far we've gotten deregulation but the jobs market in rust belt areas hasnt come back, in fact trade policy attempting to rein in china have at best stagnated progress. deeply economically depressed areas like Detroit, the UP of michigan, central wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, these arent returning to glory days of blue collar employment being a long term strategy for people.

Quote (Landmine @ Dec 1 2020 11:03am)
1. It’s been a war on emissions.

2. Obama bypassed Congress when he didn’t get his way he started his war on pollution.

3. Coal isn’t just a miner issue. Coal is used in power plants, refineries, sugar factories and still used as a heating source in some areas of rural America. The better regulations enforced the shutting down of one third of the coal fired plants In the USA, other plants are in the process of shutting down in the next few years.

I don’t know where your located in the US, but most rural areas these are the jobs that pay. It’s also not a poor white education issue as people see with miners. I’d like to see any one walk into a high paying field without a license/degree.

Should coal be done away with? Yes, but it can’t be done in the term of a president (I wouldn’t even say in our life time) or a lot of people will be left behind.


im located in wisconsin, mining here and especially in the UP is the same, highly skilled automated work closer to a CNC operator than a hard hat miner of the 1960s.

the only thing i'd add is that i dont think that the 1/3rd of mines and operations shut down over Obama mean that the other 2/3 are doomed in short order. the demand is still there, regardless of what a potential EPA under biden tries to do to end around congress. i just dont think the reality is that we can move that fast, and the EPA knows this. ending coal in a 4 year span is closer to the pandering green new deal than reality, Biden and his team seem like realists thusfar who are not going to bend to far left fringe policy. especially on something with such wide reaching consequences. i'd expect to see a renewal of the coal ash policies and a resuming of the emissions policies. which may cause a downturn in the industry but not a cliff.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 1 2020 12:12pm
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Dec 1 2020 12:36pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 1 2020 01:10pm)
Sure, so long as "moving away" is reality, and not just more pandering.

so far we've gotten deregulation but the jobs market in rust belt areas hasnt come back, in fact trade policy attempting to rein in china have at best stagnated progress. deeply economically depressed areas like Detroit, the UP of michigan, central wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, these arent returning to glory days of blue collar employment being a long term strategy for people.



im located in wisconsin, mining here and especially in the UP is the same, highly skilled automated work closer to a CNC operator than a hard hat miner of the 1960s.

the only thing i'd add is that i dont think that the 1/3rd of mines and operations shut down over Obama mean that the other 2/3 are doomed in short order. the demand is still there, regardless of what a potential EPA under biden tries to do to end around congress. i just dont think the reality is that we can move that fast, and the EPA knows this. ending coal in a 4 year span is closer to the pandering green new deal than reality, Biden and his team seem like realists thusfar who are not going to bend to far left fringe policy. especially on something with such wide reaching consequences. i'd expect to see a renewal of the coal ash policies and a resuming of the emissions policies. which may cause a downturn in the industry but not a cliff.


You're right, we can't move away from fossil fuels. They are just too effective. So many BTUs.

The way to move forward is to try to increase efficiency at the turbine of the internal and external combustion engine. So much energy is lost there. If we can make turbines more effective it would be an energy revolution.
Member
Posts: 92,978
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Dec 1 2020 12:39pm
Quote (Skinned @ Dec 1 2020 12:36pm)
You're right, we can't move away from fossil fuels. They are just too effective. So many BTUs.

The way to move forward is to try to increase efficiency at the turbine of the internal and external combustion engine. So much energy is lost there. If we can make turbines more effective it would be an energy revolution.


agreed!

Quote
9 user(s) are reading this topic (2 guests, 2 anonymous): thesnipa, sir_lance_bb, Surfpunk, MSX98, excellence, Landmine


nuc nuc nuc nuclear post detected
Member
Posts: 15,802
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
Dec 1 2020 01:48pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 1 2020 11:10am)
Sure, so long as "moving away" is reality, and not just more pandering.

so far we've gotten deregulation but the jobs market in rust belt areas hasnt come back, in fact trade policy attempting to rein in china have at best stagnated progress. deeply economically depressed areas like Detroit, the UP of michigan, central wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, these arent returning to glory days of blue collar employment being a long term strategy for people.



im located in wisconsin, mining here and especially in the UP is the same, highly skilled automated work closer to a CNC operator than a hard hat miner of the 1960s.

the only thing i'd add is that i dont think that the 1/3rd of mines and operations shut down over Obama mean that the other 2/3 are doomed in short order. the demand is still there, regardless of what a potential EPA under biden tries to do to end around congress. i just dont think the reality is that we can move that fast, and the EPA knows this. ending coal in a 4 year span is closer to the pandering green new deal than reality, Biden and his team seem like realists thusfar who are not going to bend to far left fringe policy. especially on something with such wide reaching consequences. i'd expect to see a renewal of the coal ash policies and a resuming of the emissions policies. which may cause a downturn in the industry but not a cliff.



I simply don’t have any disagreement with that.
Member
Posts: 37,613
Joined: May 3 2007
Gold: 119,903.34
Dec 1 2020 02:22pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 1 2020 01:39pm)
agreed!



nuc nuc nuc nuclear post detected


Nuclear energy is the best.
Member
Posts: 32,007
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,863.50
Dec 1 2020 06:32pm
Member
Posts: 41,466
Joined: Jul 9 2005
Gold: 4,673.69
Dec 2 2020 04:16am

Backstory:
https://www.politico.eu/article/police-arrests-20-people-including-eu-officials-at-lockdown-party-in-brussels/
He is József Szájer a Member of European Parliament from Hungary's ruling ultra conservative anti LBGTPQRS, anti same sex marriage far righty Fidesz party.
"A senior MEP from Hungary’s ruling Fidesz party admitted Tuesday that he took part in a “lockdown party” — described by local media as “an orgy” — that was broken up by Brussels police.

József Szájer said in a statement that he was “present” at the “private party” — at which, according to the Belgian press, police found 25 naked men, including an MEP and a number of diplomats.

According to a press release from the public prosecutor’s office, “A passer-by reported to the police that he had seen a man fleeing along the gutter; he was able to identify the man. The man’s hands were bloody. It is possible that he may have been injured while fleeing. Narcotics were found in his backpack. The man was unable to produce any identity documents. He was escorted to his place of residence, where he identified himself as S. J. (1961) by means of a diplomatic passport.”


This post was edited by Thomas Cross on Dec 2 2020 04:18am
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Dec 2 2020 05:21am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1423242334234423542365001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll