Quote (ofthevoid @ Dec 1 2020 10:55am)
Platforms are not static. Just because a party had x position 20 years ago doesn't mean them moving away from that position is invalidated because of the past.
Sure, so long as "moving away" is reality, and not just more pandering.
so far we've gotten deregulation but the jobs market in rust belt areas hasnt come back, in fact trade policy attempting to rein in china have at best stagnated progress. deeply economically depressed areas like Detroit, the UP of michigan, central wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, these arent returning to glory days of blue collar employment being a long term strategy for people.
Quote (Landmine @ Dec 1 2020 11:03am)
1. It’s been a war on emissions.
2. Obama bypassed Congress when he didn’t get his way he started his war on pollution.
3. Coal isn’t just a miner issue. Coal is used in power plants, refineries, sugar factories and still used as a heating source in some areas of rural America. The better regulations enforced the shutting down of one third of the coal fired plants In the USA, other plants are in the process of shutting down in the next few years.
I don’t know where your located in the US, but most rural areas these are the jobs that pay. It’s also not a poor white education issue as people see with miners. I’d like to see any one walk into a high paying field without a license/degree.
Should coal be done away with? Yes, but it can’t be done in the term of a president (I wouldn’t even say in our life time) or a lot of people will be left behind.
im located in wisconsin, mining here and especially in the UP is the same, highly skilled automated work closer to a CNC operator than a hard hat miner of the 1960s.
the only thing i'd add is that i dont think that the 1/3rd of mines and operations shut down over Obama mean that the other 2/3 are doomed in short order. the demand is still there, regardless of what a potential EPA under biden tries to do to end around congress. i just dont think the reality is that we can move that fast, and the EPA knows this. ending coal in a 4 year span is closer to the pandering green new deal than reality, Biden and his team seem like realists thusfar who are not going to bend to far left fringe policy. especially on something with such wide reaching consequences. i'd expect to see a renewal of the coal ash policies and a resuming of the emissions policies. which may cause a downturn in the industry but not a cliff.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 1 2020 12:12pm