you really need to learn the difference between anecdotal evidence and policy, because you're just uncritically buying into the baseless notion that "the right" is being deplatformed and censored more than "the left".

how about providing some real evidence? because "if you can't see that you're ignorant" is not actually proof. can you point to a study that supports your claim for example? just mentioning a couple of allegedly oppressed right wingers (many of which falsely claiming they were 'censored' for being conservatives, while in reality having repeatedly and massively violated community standards that everyone has to follow) clutching their pearls, and mindlessly repeating their conspiracy theories doesn't cut it...

just out of curiosity: which "legitimate conservative opinion" do you think is being 'censored' for example, and how exactly?

Yeah every major right wing ban i see is due to serious rule breeches, i mean alex jones threatened to kill twitters ceo to his face, does that warrant a ban? I say yes.

Twitter censorship. Duh lmk if I need to explain
Facebook censorship, and cambridge analytics (funny CA got slammed and none of the others buying that DATA too!)
Google is clearly censoring search results in favor of TOP media. Can show you the code or article citing it, including date it was changed and audit log of authorization. Odd the date. We can get to that though
Media isn't even attempting to cover Election fraud, ANYONE out that does gets labeled as conspiracy. Even if it's just an interview of a witness or lawyer.

Why is it only conservatives get banned from these platforms? Why is there a website that archives Trump tweets and why are so many deleted, and don't seem to break any ToS?

Get a clue man

This post was edited by Jere on Nov 28 2020 12:50pm

This implies Trump is shit lol

I thought he was dismantling the conspiracy to control the country

exact same problem as your fellow right wing nutjob: you don't know the difference between anecdotes and facts, between right wing talking points and actual policy. you make patently false claims and don't provide a SINGLE piece of statistical proof.

"get a clue" has exactly the same argumentative value as "if you don't see it, you're just ignorant": zero. get facts, and we can talk, but so far all you have is deranged conspiranoia. step up your game if you can, until then don't bother addressing me again, you clown.

Ok this ones funny