d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Coronavirus Thread
Prev1417418419420421910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,187
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Apr 20 2020 04:18pm
Quote (Sakuraba @ 20 Apr 2020 22:25)
would have given me some clarity and peace of mind, I'd probably be over the top cautious, let people I was in contact with know. I held off on going to the hospital in part because I questioned if it could be something else, not wanting to risk exposing myself to covid given the amount of people going to the hospital for it at the time, possibly contracting it on top of something else.


Indeed. If you suspect to have it, it's probably best for everyone if you just self-isolate for 2-3 weeks and not risk unintentionally exposing others in the hospital/the doctor's office/public transport on the way there. I would only recommend going to the hospital if the symptoms call for it.

Quote (Thor123422 @ 20 Apr 2020 21:02)
Having everybody in a single pool from which you can negotiate prices is a way to address the cost issue though. Having everybody broken into groups that have to do their own separate negotiations and take care of their own administrative costs and get their own price points from every different provider does nothing but add inefficiency, and that inefficiency is added to the cost of healthcare and paid for by the insured.


A single-payer system isnt necessary for universal healthcare. In fact, there is plenty of historical precedent from all sorts of fields that government-run [anything] tends to be expensive and inefficient.

Dont get me wrong, a single-payer system would probably be cheaper than the unholy mess that is your current system, but I'm not sold on single-payer. For example, most of continental Europe does have a market-based system with for-profit insurances which are competing with each other - just within a tightly regulated market. And it's working really well, all things considered. Probably better than the NHS in the UK, which is the role-model of single-payer.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 20 2020 04:20pm
Member
Posts: 33,771
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Apr 20 2020 04:40pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Apr 20 2020 11:18pm)
Indeed. If you suspect to have it, it's probably best for everyone if you just self-isolate for 2-3 weeks and not risk unintentionally exposing others in the hospital/the doctor's office/public transport on the way there. I would only recommend going to the hospital if the symptoms call for it.



A single-payer system isnt necessary for universal healthcare. In fact, there is plenty of historical precedent from all sorts of fields that government-run [anything] tends to be expensive and inefficient.

Dont get me wrong, a single-payer system would probably be cheaper than the unholy mess that is your current system, but I'm not sold on single-payer. For example, most of continental Europe does have a market-based system with for-profit insurances which are competing with each other - just within a tightly regulated market. And it's working really well, all things considered. Probably better than the NHS in the UK, which is the role-model of single-payer.


NHS is single payer but you can also get private insurance. That's what people don't get, they think single payer means they have to use the public option. You don't, you just have to pay for it.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 20 2020 04:57pm
Quote (Sakuraba @ 20 Apr 2020 17:33)
It was rough when I had trouble breathing. When I went to the hospital was when everything was at its worst, the fatigue was actually really bad. I slept 90% of the next 3 days after that. I could get up after a 12 hour sleep and I didn't have the energy to even sit down for 20 minutes, I was completely winded and aching all over.



/e the above seems 100% reason to test

I don't get it

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Apr 20 2020 05:16pm
Member
Posts: 54,187
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Apr 20 2020 05:28pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ 21 Apr 2020 00:57)
/e the above seems 100% reason to test

I don't get it


Like I said, I've read the exact same reports from a variety of countries: people with all the symptoms being denied the test by their GP. Imho, it's really obvious what was going on: testing capacities were far too low, so the Departments of Health or some other higher-up government body ordered doctors to use tests sparingly and limit them to patients who are either hospitalized with the typical corona symptoms, or who came in contact with a confirmed case.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 20 2020 05:50pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 21 Apr 2020 01:28)
Like I said, I've read the exact same reports from a variety of countries: people with all the symptoms being denied the test by their GP. Imho, it's really obvious what was going on: testing capacities were far too low, so the Departments of Health or some other higher-up government body ordered doctors to use tests sparingly and limit them to patients who are either hospitalized with the typical corona symptoms, or who came in contact with a confirmed case.


At the beginning of the epidemic yes, but in recent weeks...
His case seems so blatant, at this point he should have been clearly ordered to stay at home and to come back later for a test.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 21 2020 12:10am
/google translate

------------

5.7% of French people will have been infected by May 11, according to an estimate by the Institut Pasteur
Only 5.7% of French people, or 3.7 million people, will have been infected with the new coronavirus by May 11, the day of the start of deconfinement, according to estimates presented in a prepublication of the Institut Pasteur, Tuesday April 21. A level that is very insufficient to avoid a second epidemic wave if all measures were completely lifted by this date. "For collective immunity to be sufficient to avoid a second wave, 70% of people with immunity would be needed. We are far below," said the study's lead author, Simon Cauchemez.
https://hal-pasteur.archives-ouvertes.fr/pasteur-02548181

---------------

This is when everyone has to wear a mask....

/nb: i ordered Dark Green ones from a professional seamstress, thus it's fabric but still valid.



This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Apr 21 2020 12:21am
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Apr 21 2020 12:19am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Apr 21 2020 08:10am)
/google translate

------------

5.7% of French people will have been infected by May 11, according to an estimate by the Institut Pasteur
Only 5.7% of French people, or 3.7 million people, will have been infected with the new coronavirus by May 11, the day of the start of deconfinement, according to estimates presented in a prepublication of the Institut Pasteur, Tuesday April 21. A level that is very insufficient to avoid a second epidemic wave if all measures were completely lifted by this date. "For collective immunity to be sufficient to avoid a second wave, 70% of people with immunity would be needed. We are far below," said the study's lead author, Simon Cauchemez.
https://hal-pasteur.archives-ouvertes.fr/pasteur-02548181

---------------

This is when everyone has to wear a mask....

/nb: i ordered Dark Green ones


Hmm. I'd have preferred if estimation of current infection/immunity levels were done with antibody testing.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 21 2020 12:31am
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 21 2020 12:32am
Quote (balrog66 @ 21 Apr 2020 08:19)
Hmm. I'd have preferred if estimation of current infection/immunity levels were done with antibody testing.


Maybe because it's not enough reliable yet ?

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/14/health/coronavirus-antibody-tests-scientists/index.html

Quote (fender @ 21 Apr 2020 08:31)


I'm glad we gone from 7k to 5k active ICU here, some french people also have been taken in SWISS and LUXEMBOURG, probably because they were very close of the borders.
Like some in the "grand east" area and got send into Germany by... Helicopter.

That's dead bodies in the background ?

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Apr 21 2020 12:44am
Member
Posts: 54,187
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Apr 21 2020 03:48am
Quote (fender @ 21 Apr 2020 08:31)


Probably a deliberate PR move so that the Mediterranean countries have a harder time accusing Germany of a "lack of solidarity" over its rejection of coronabonds...
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1417418419420421910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll