i proved Q existed,
i said the election fraud was a massive sting operation
i never gave any dates
so again i say your statement above is complete bullshit

i proved Q exists and used left sources to prove it
i said this election is a massive sting operation (and it is)
sidney powell court filing have military intelligence officials at witnesses (they're names are redacted)
forensic evidence has proven fraud
affidavits of military colonels stating they have evidence (phone calls) of ballot orders being placed in china, to be shipped into the u.s

so again you statement above is bullshit

Huh? I'm talking about 30+ judges dismissing thirty+ lies about election fraud leading up to this seemingly credible instance.

The Trump campaign is dishonest when it claimed to have evidence of election fraud without any, and having it proved.

My arguement is that people who do not lie all the time are more credible.

Sidney Powell unintentionally hilarious. So was Guiliani's witness yesterday.

This post was edited by Skinned on Dec 4 2020 01:19pm

the court cases, hearings are to wake up more people
the real work hasnt gone public yet
we have supreme court and nsa/millitary intelligence investigations
go read section 1A of trumps executive order, maybe pay attention

-------------
Also its funny to watch liberal morons try to be slick and secretly handover voting machine drives not knowing they are being recorded
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQxnjPUbxpA

Democrats politicans are the best, aren't they

Who the hell is arguing that Q doesn't exist? Only the Qdiot is even bringing that up.

Now, who is arguing that Q's credibility is shit? Pretty much everyone else in this thread other than the Qdiots.

If it "hasn't gone public yet" then by definition you don't have evidence it's happening.



I'm not convinced Q is a single person.

I think Q was likely a shitpost, and then continued to be a shitpost by the same and other people.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Dec 4 2020 01:27pm

Ugh. The secret knowledge approach is so BORING AND PASSE.

The courts are it. When you lose there you just lose. There is no issue here for the SCOTUS to rule on. There has to be an argument to get there.

Sidney Powell's work is full of spelling errors and non sequitors. I did better work as an undergrad.

But the secret knowledge thing is so boring and passe.

I did not see a single person argue Q didn't exist.

Please find the quotes and provide them.