I hate high density housing in the suburbs that tend to house illegal immigrant, so I am completely okay with this.

Nah, it's purely because if we didn't have eviction moratoriums it would make the pandemic far worse, would overwhelm the infrastructure around the homeless, and would result in a homelessness crisis far worse than even the great depression.

I feel bad for landlords who can't evict shitty tenants, but the results of mass homelessness would be country and economy destroying even worse than what we've already experienced.

I put the onus on the shitty government response, not on the tenant and not on the landlord. I do, however, think the landlord should have expected a situation at some point where renting out her property was difficult, as that's the most basic hardship a landlord can experience.

Again false. If the government is going to lockdown businesses so that tenants have no income, then it's up to the government to provide mortgage relief to the landlord. The government failed to do so.

Since the government failed to provide any relief, then since it's the landlord paying for their own property, paying all the bills for that property, they need to have the right to move into the property THEY are paying for rather than being homeless.

In your communist utopia, however, the person who has invested nothing and is paying nothing sleeps warm and comfortable while somebody else works as a homeless slave to pay for the squatter's free ride.

How many households would be homeless if the squatter is evicted? One. How many households are homeless because the landlord is working as a slave to support the squatter like an errant child? One.

AGAIN, only a communist believes others should slave away full time homeless so that others can have a free ride. You have NOT put the onus on the shitty democratic government of New York. You've put the onus on the landlord for not "planning ahead" to fully support a squatter.

That's a very reasonable position. Almost sounds like one I've said a dozen times in a dozen threads including the post you are literally quoting where I called out the government response.

Right. You've been totally criticizing the Democratic response in New York, rather than blaming the landlord.

Stop spamming, stop lying, and stop being stupid.

The landlord is homeless when they're still paying for their property. They shouldn't be homeless. They are only homeless because the government has imposed homelessness on them, and is forcing them to act as a slave to provide a home for a squatter.

Communism at it's finest.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Mar 25 2021 06:34pm

Man you're on a roll tonight lol

Even your own quotes are stupid. At any point, if the Landlord went a year without a tenant, they could move into their own property. Do you understand? They do NOT need to be able to take a year without rent.

You're attempting to impose corporate guidelines that are themselves false on private ownership. Once again, why is a landlord homeless while the home they've actively paid for for the last year has a squatter they can't evict?

Why are you blaming the landlord for the communist policies of the New York "Democratic" government?

Edit: Even had this been a case where the landlord DID end up without a tenant for a year but it was a secondary property, they could simply sell the property, cashing out the equity they'd gained from their initial investment + payments. But due to the anti-eviction policy, they cannot even put the home up for sale.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Mar 25 2021 06:41pm

lol

Which of these bright young stars will be the successor to AOC?

I wanna fart in that super quiet room