d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Don't Say Gay
Prev1404142434454Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 92,977
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Apr 18 2022 08:40am
Quote (David_911 @ Apr 18 2022 09:37am)
If that were true then how could we have legal definitions of hate crimes? There would never be any proof!


legislators subjectively define what is a hate crime. subjective doesnt mean there isnt an overwhelming consensus, it means its not something you can prove 100%.

law overall and its application isnt even objective most of the time.

like if i post online "____ slept with my wife, im gonna kill him". then i drive to his house on facebook live talking about how i'll kill him, then i kill him. a jury and judge still need to decide if my mental state played a role in the murder or if i should be given a lower sentence.
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Apr 18 2022 08:48am
Quote (David_911 @ Apr 18 2022 07:15am)
You want to teach a 2nd grade child with gay parents that their parents are abnormal.


I don't think you can read. I will repeat, not teaching kids that gays are normal is NOT the same as teaching them homos are abnormal. The former is an omission, whereas the latter is a commission.

Gee, for a fed, you are really slow.
Member
Posts: 674
Joined: Sep 23 2004
Gold: 359.50
Apr 18 2022 08:49am
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 18 2022 10:40am)
legislators subjectively define what is a hate crime. subjective doesnt mean there isnt an overwhelming consensus, it means its not something you can prove 100%..


If there were no clear definitions, no person would every be convicted guilty beyond the shadow of a doubt by a jury of their peers.

Disregarding that, maybe hate speech would have been a better example to use in this context.
Member
Posts: 92,977
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Apr 18 2022 08:51am
Quote (David_911 @ Apr 18 2022 09:49am)
If there were no clear definitions, no person would every be convicted guilty beyond the shadow of a doubt by a jury of their peers.

Disregarding that, maybe hate speech would have been a better example to use in this context.


something being defined doesnt make it objective.

i agree jessi is a hateful little puke, as does most of society, but its still not objective.

and overall hate crime is an addition to a regular charge. i can stand outside with a sign that says "god hates fags" and thats not a crime, if i beat a straight person with it that's assault, if i beat a gay person with it that's assault with a hate crime on top.
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Apr 18 2022 08:52am
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 18 2022 07:51am)

i agree jessi is a hateful little puke


Haha, I trigger you.
Member
Posts: 92,977
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Apr 18 2022 08:54am
Quote (JessiWan @ Apr 18 2022 09:52am)
Haha, I trigger you.


misreading anger for disgust is your greatest mistake in pard.

we all know you dont have enough power in real life to do anything so we arent scared enough to even be mildly angered.

you admitted in this very thread if trans were allowed in the girls bathroom you'd do nothing, you'd stand by and just hope they get run out by other women who are willing to actually do something.

you're a cheerleader and nothing more, and we all know it.
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Apr 18 2022 08:56am
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 18 2022 07:54am)

you admitted in this very thread if trans were allowed in the girls bathroom you'd do nothing, you'd stand by and just hope they get run out by other women who are willing to actually do something.


Yes I would indeed and I know this triggers you as well, which brings me great joy.
Member
Posts: 674
Joined: Sep 23 2004
Gold: 359.50
Apr 18 2022 08:57am
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 18 2022 10:51am)
something being defined doesnt make it objective.

i agree jessi is a hateful little puke, as does most of society, but its still not objective.


I'm not sure I understand the point you are trying to make.
I'm not here to argue the semantics of hate.

But I'm glad we agree that jessi is hateful and bigoted.
She gets real upset that I keep saying that, but she just keeps saying hateful and bigoted things.
A spade's a spade.
Member
Posts: 7,361
Joined: Jul 22 2021
Gold: 1,216.00
Apr 18 2022 09:02am
Quote (David_911 @ Apr 18 2022 10:57am)
I'm not sure I understand the point you are trying to make.
I'm not here to argue the semantics of hate.

But I'm glad we agree that jessi is hateful and bigoted.
She gets real upset that I keep saying that, but she just keeps saying hateful and bigoted things.
A spade's a spade.


what does it say about you that you keep mentioning that.
Member
Posts: 92,977
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Apr 18 2022 09:04am
Quote (David_911 @ Apr 18 2022 09:57am)
I'm not sure I understand the point you are trying to make.
I'm not here to argue the semantics of hate.

But I'm glad we agree that jessi is hateful and bigoted.
She gets real upset that I keep saying that, but she just keeps saying hateful and bigoted things.
A spade's a spade.


she said "prove im hateful", she wants you to post some definition. then she's disagree, and say you didnt prove anything.

she does this often, rather than engage she just says "prove it", and if its objectively wrong she'll either attack the source you posted or she'll just run away.

but overall its just some dude pretending to be a canadian asian lady, so i wouldnt take them seriously. they prob live in a trailer and have no money.

Quote (JessiWan @ Apr 18 2022 09:56am)
Yes I would indeed and I know this triggers you as well, which brings me great joy.


u being a coward triggers me? lol. watching you admit stuff like that makes my day. big talk, no action. you're basically a chihuahua.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1404142434454Next
Closed New Topic New Poll