Second-rate race-baiting is second rate.

so instead of leaving and going home like all the other people that went home without murdering people

he murdered two people.

Not when someone says "But I don't see you going after them. Your "justice" is selective."

But has not once asked my stance on protestors engaging in criminal activity such as property damage or bodily harm to people of which I all condemn if anyone asked.

If this topic was about if building damage and harm to people should be criminal or not and if I think it would be criminal in court and not about Kyle we would be talking about that, but its not.

This post was edited by SBD on Nov 3 2021 04:21pm

So the 2 sex offenders and rosenbaum who was attempting to attack someone for putting out a dumpster fire that was being pushed in to a gas station are the degenerates right? rosenbaum making racist remarks telling people to "shoot me nigger" "shoot me nigger" over and over again?


I find pushing a dumpster fire in to a gas station an act of terrorism.

50 mill in damages. 100 building damaged 40 buildings burnt to the ground. National guard should have just wiped the terrorists out

This post was edited by aaron9999 on Nov 3 2021 04:22pm

White trash is trash.

I understand that you butt is still hurting but can you please keep your suffering in private.

I am not white.

prove it witha timestamped pic then

Yes, they are mentally ill, but Rittenhouse 100% had ulterior motives for going there just like the predominantly white crowd on Jan 6th.

I'm glad we were able to reach some common ground, but you lost me at the bolded section here.

Super fudd mentality, if you're into skeet shooting and duck hunting by all means you do you, but that is not at all what the second amendment is about and it doesn't matter what anyone thinks of when they hear gun owners, if a person is acting within the confines of the laws this matters zero. I don't think you were making this point regarding any legality standpoint but it does shine a bit of light on what your feelings are towards the second amendment and the right to self defense as a whole.

As I read through the rest of the thread I also see more doubling down on the open carry escalation of violence rhetoric which is just plain silly at this point and seems to be being used throughout the thread (by multiple people) to insinuate that it may somehow in some small way justify people commiting actual acts of violence against the person carrying, which is obviously ludicrous.

Then what irritates me even further is the implications and outright admission that you think anyone who disagrees with the "escalation of violence" thing you're pushing as "basic knowledge" or "day one information" is somehow less responsible as a gun owner than you, as if that automatically means they don't take firearms training or safety seriously. That my friend is absolutely absurd. It's all coming across as if you're almost trying to virtue signal by using your arbitrary beliefs as a measurement for what constitutes a good firearms owner from a bad firearms owner. What you use your firearms for or want firearms ownership to mean to people has no bearing on that distinction.

Feel free to correct me if I am mistaken on your views but you are coming off this way imo

This post was edited by Crye on Nov 3 2021 04:27pm