Quote (ReturnFormer @ Feb 18 2021 12:18am)
No, it's basic logic that any 5 year old can follow. It doesn't say how much the co2 went up, only that it was significant enough to be measured. If it were enough to be harmful, why would they conclude that there are no harmful effects? Clearly it didn't go up enough to be harmful. The conclusion is not a separate unrelated entity, it's all one paper. It's all connected. "Based on these results (which includes that co2 went up) we conclude that (there are no harmful effects)" You accuse ME of cherry picking, yet it's you who is doing that by ignoring the conclusion. It all goes together. I'm not ignoring the results, the conclusion is a direct extrapolation of them. If the conclusion is that there are no harmful effects, then clearly whatever amount the co2 went up by is not enough to be harmful.
no harmful effects for a 2 day test ???
you asked me for a study pre dated covid that showing harmful effects. lowering oxygen is harmful.
i stuck it in your face and you only respond with a weak azz excuse......................mask zombie you stuck that thing on your face never even questioned it
Long-term use of respiratory protection did not result in any clinically relevant physiologicburden for health care personnel
(doesnt mean you can decide that there would be no long term physical damage. 5 year old logic? you dont have
appears your confusing "not clinically relevant" and just deciding that means "not relevant" fukn eh
adjective [ADJECTIVE noun] Clinical means involving or relating to the direct medical treatment or testing of patients.
Clinically relevant definition and meaning | Collins English ...
This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 18 2021 02:38am