d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Fauchi Mask Recommendation
Prev1404142434453Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Feb 18 2021 02:18am
Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 18 2021 02:50am)


No, it's basic logic that any 5 year old can follow. It doesn't say how much the co2 went up, only that it was significant enough to be measured. If it were enough to be harmful, why would they conclude that there are no harmful effects? Clearly it didn't go up enough to be harmful. The conclusion is not a separate unrelated entity, it's all one paper. It's all connected. "Based on these results (which includes that co2 went up) we conclude that (there are no harmful effects)" You accuse ME of cherry picking, yet it's you who is doing that by ignoring the conclusion. It all goes together. I'm not ignoring the results, the conclusion is a direct extrapolation of them. If the conclusion is that there are no harmful effects, then clearly whatever amount the co2 went up by is not enough to be harmful.
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Feb 18 2021 02:20am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 18 2021 03:14am)
I 100% disagree. What you wear on your face is your choice. If you WANT to wear a mask, fine. If some government official arbitrarily mandates that you do so, they've crossed the line. If they want to mandate it on government property? Fine. On private property, be it business or resident? No. Bow to that, lockdowns are next.

It took 1 week to go from mask compliance to full lockdowns here. I have no desire to see this nonsense spread. And let's not forget, businesses are being told they are required to enforce mask mandates or receive fines or get their business licenses yanked. What the literal fuck? If a law has been broken, that's what law enforcement is for. But it's not a law, is it?

Note: If a business wishes to require, for their safety or the safety of their employees or customers that you wear a mask on premises? No worries. Their business, their property.


What you wear on your ass is your choice. If you WANT to wear a pants, fine. If some government official arbitrarily mandates that you do so, they've crossed the line. If they want to mandate it on government property? Fine. On private property, be it business or resident? No. Bow to that, lockdowns are next.
Member
Posts: 47,100
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 18 2021 02:26am
Quote (ReturnFormer @ Feb 18 2021 12:18am)
No, it's basic logic that any 5 year old can follow. It doesn't say how much the co2 went up, only that it was significant enough to be measured. If it were enough to be harmful, why would they conclude that there are no harmful effects? Clearly it didn't go up enough to be harmful. The conclusion is not a separate unrelated entity, it's all one paper. It's all connected. "Based on these results (which includes that co2 went up) we conclude that (there are no harmful effects)" You accuse ME of cherry picking, yet it's you who is doing that by ignoring the conclusion. It all goes together. I'm not ignoring the results, the conclusion is a direct extrapolation of them. If the conclusion is that there are no harmful effects, then clearly whatever amount the co2 went up by is not enough to be harmful.


no harmful effects for a 2 day test ???
you asked me for a study pre dated covid that showing harmful effects. lowering oxygen is harmful.
i stuck it in your face and you only respond with a weak azz excuse......................mask zombie you stuck that thing on your face never even questioned it

Long-term use of respiratory protection did not result in any clinically relevant physiologicburden for health care personnel
(doesnt mean you can decide that there would be no long term physical damage. 5 year old logic? you dont have

appears your confusing "not clinically relevant" and just deciding that means "not relevant" fukn eh

adjective [ADJECTIVE noun] Clinical means involving or relating to the direct medical treatment or testing of patients.
Clinically relevant definition and meaning | Collins English ...

This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 18 2021 02:38am
Member
Posts: 47,100
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 18 2021 08:02am
mask zombies gona move it up to four masks?
Wear 4 MASKS! / Lockdown news roundup
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2TGF5kLDPgtT/
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Feb 18 2021 08:03am
Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 18 2021 03:26am)
no harmful effects for a 2 day test ???
you asked me for a study pre dated covid that showing harmful effects. lowering oxygen is harmful.
i stuck it in your face and you only respond with a weak azz excuse......................mask zombie you stuck that thing on your face never even questioned it

Long-term use of respiratory protection did not result in any clinically relevant physiologicburden for health care personnel
(doesnt mean you can decide that there would be no long term physical damage. 5 year old logic? you dont have

appears your confusing "not clinically relevant" and just deciding that means "not relevant" fukn eh

adjective [ADJECTIVE noun] Clinical means involving or relating to the direct medical treatment or testing of patients.
Clinically relevant definition and meaning | Collins English ...


Lowering oxygen is not necessarily harmful. You lower the oxygen you inhale every time you fart. For each breath you only absorb about a third of the oxygen (at most, it's really closer to a quarter) that is in the air. That means you could lower the oxygen in the air you're breathing by 66% and still have absolutely zero negative effect. If they concluded that there are no harmful effects, then obviously their result that co2 is increased is still within the threshold of not making a difference. You are retarded if you think that research that says there are no harmful effects supports your position that there are...
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Feb 18 2021 08:05am
[
Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 18 2021 03:26am)
Long-term use of respiratory protection did not result in any clinically relevant physiologicburden for health care personnel


(doesnt mean you can decide that there would be no long term physical damage. 5 year old logic? you dont have


Its not me deciding, that's literally what that means... :bonk:

This post was edited by ReturnFormer on Feb 18 2021 08:10am
Member
Posts: 47,100
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 18 2021 08:14am
Quote (ReturnFormer @ Feb 18 2021 06:03am)
Lowering oxygen is not necessarily harmful. You lower the oxygen you inhale every time you fart. For each breath you only absorb about a third of the oxygen (at most, it's really closer to a quarter) that is in the air. That means you could lower the oxygen in the air you're breathing by 66% and still have absolutely zero negative effect. If they concluded that there are no harmful effects, then obviously their result that co2 is increased is still within the threshold of not making a difference. You are retarded if you think that research that says there are no harmful effects supports your position that there are...


Quote (ReturnFormer @ Feb 18 2021 06:05am)
[

That's literally what that means... :bonk:


lower % o2 lower the % intake. you ever wonder why footbaal players dont wear masks when they are playing?
just because you can survive something doesnt mean its not harmful. thats the part were you mask zombies really fail at. you think if some one survives it doesnt count.

lol no long term affect is determined with a 2 day study . ya know every time ya put up the bonk you always seem to be bonking your self

lets face the facts. you slapped that mask on because you were told to. now your grasping for arguments and failing

This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 18 2021 08:15am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 18 2021 08:18am
Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 18 2021 08:14am)
lower % o2 lower the % intake. you ever wonder why footbaal players dont wear masks when they are playing?
just because you can survive something doesnt mean its not harmful. thats the part were you mask zombies really fail at. you think if some one survives it doesnt count.

lol no long term affect is determined with a 2 day study . ya know every time ya put up the bonk you always seem to be bonking your self

lets face the facts. you slapped that mask on because you were told to. now your grasping for arguments and failing


The most favorable this line of argument gets for you is that no bad effects from mask wearing have been proven, but they haven't been ruled out.

So when you claim it's harmful, that's a lie, because you don't have evidence.
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Feb 18 2021 08:21am
Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 18 2021 09:14am)
lower % o2 lower the % intake. you ever wonder why footbaal players dont wear masks when they are playing?
just because you can survive something doesnt mean its not harmful. thats the part were you mask zombies really fail at. you think if some one survives it doesnt count.

lol no long term affect is determined with a 2 day study . ya know every time ya put up the bonk you always seem to be bonking your self

lets face the facts. you slapped that mask on because you were told to. now your grasping for arguments and failing


Right, keep up that doublethink. You're clearly so enamored with the idea that masks are harmful that rational thought is beyond you. Again, you really have to be retarded to think that a study that concludes "not harmful" means that they are harmful...
Member
Posts: 150,027
Joined: Apr 19 2005
Gold: 290.11
Feb 18 2021 08:27am
Masks do not lower oxygen levels....

Tin foil hats need to go. Some people are so damn stupid.

This post was edited by Sixers on Feb 18 2021 08:28am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1404142434453Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll