It'd be 'biased.'

How did everyone feel about Clinton's foreign policy speech?

Mainly the direct attacks on Trump's inexperience and comical approach to policy

I thought it was solid

To be fair i cant directly link it, the guy's twitter page was rage-deleted...too bad for him some opportunist reich-wing antichrist took a screenshot and posted it all over reich-wing news sites...like twitter itself.

Incapable of keeping Trump out of her mind

If you think potentially electing an inexperienced candidate with thin skin and no control over his emotions is not relevant to a foreign policy discussion you would be very wrong.

I thought the speech was pretty solid, too. The difference between Trump and Hillary in foreign policy is quite huge. She's too war-hawkish for me, but if she more or less keeps things the way they are with the Obama administration, I'll be happy. For instance, the Iran Nuclear Deal, by most accounts, is a pretty good deal. I would hate to see that scrapped by Trump or another Republican.

I like when Hillary gets in front of cameras and talk about her ideas for America outside of rally settings. It's nice to actually see her face and hear her ideas. She does far too many fundraising events and private events and not enough public events. Still waiting for that next press conference. It's been 182 days since the last one. Her campaign has to approve of most questions before she will do them in a TV interview.

i think "hillary clinton" was one of the most popular topics of all the GOP debates combined. Maybe only muslims surpassed it. Rubio could hardly get out a Robotic transmission without uttering phrases like "we can't let HRC win!" One of Trumps most common closers to rebuttals was "i havent even gotten started on Hillary yet."

It was blistering. And judging by how it's being covered it worked, and accomplished a couple of pretty important things: She "won" the day's cycle despite all of Trump's flailing, and he got so bothered by it that he didn't even mention Ryan's endorsement, meaning that whole game they played was practically for nothing.

The press may start paying more attention to what campaign operatives have been saying for months now too, that Clinton is just not going to have to same problem that the Republican field did with Trump: she has no problem forcefully attacking him and she makes him look small, not the other way around, as he often tried to do with Jeb, Rubio, Rand, or others. She's the most experienced nominee in U.S. history, he's a neophyte who understands American government about as much (or less) than most college freshmen.

impeccably timed, took the wind out of the sails of this:
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/281973-new-clinton-emails-due-out-in-days-before-convention

here in cali today