d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Duffington Post > Bringing You Real News
Prev1399400401402403587Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 4 2021 08:57am
Quote (duffman316 @ Feb 4 2021 08:55am)
Scientific study proves men taking drugs are still faster than women

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/dec/07/study-suggests-ioc-adjustment-period-for-trans-women-may-be-too-short
A groundbreaking new study on transgender athletes has found trans women retain a 12% advantage in running tests even after taking hormones for two years to suppress their testosterone. The results, researchers suggest, indicate the current International Olympic Committee guidelines may give trans women an “unfair competitive advantage” over biological women.

World Rugby recently became the first sports federation to ban trans women from women’s rugby, citing “significant” safety risks and fairness concerns. But most sports still follow IOC guidelines from 2015, which permit trans women to play against biological women providing their testosterone remains below 10 nanomoles per litre – a figure higher than average biological female levels, which range from 0.12 to 1.79nmol/L.


South Park actually did a good episode on this.

The sports issue is the only issue I see a legitimate grievance on. The hormone / puberty blocker controversy is a non-starter since that's gated by doctors who have outcome-based metrics to follow. The bathroom thing is just gays getting married for the insurance 2 electric boogaloo. Problem is I haven't seen a good answer.

Although I also don't know if a 12% advantage is that significant. Like, I don't know enough about sports statistics to say if that's a little or a lot.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Feb 4 2021 08:59am
Member
Posts: 23,553
Joined: Jul 3 2008
Gold: 3,469.67
Feb 4 2021 11:30am
Quote (duffman316 @ Feb 4 2021 08:55am)
Scientific study proves men taking drugs are still faster than women

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/dec/07/study-suggests-ioc-adjustment-period-for-trans-women-may-be-too-short
A groundbreaking new study on transgender athletes has found trans women retain a 12% advantage in running tests even after taking hormones for two years to suppress their testosterone. The results, researchers suggest, indicate the current International Olympic Committee guidelines may give trans women an “unfair competitive advantage” over biological women.

World Rugby recently became the first sports federation to ban trans women from women’s rugby, citing “significant” safety risks and fairness concerns. But most sports still follow IOC guidelines from 2015, which permit trans women to play against biological women providing their testosterone remains below 10 nanomoles per litre – a figure higher than average biological female levels, which range from 0.12 to 1.79nmol/L.


https://www.rt.com/sport/514554-aclu-transgender-athletes-myths/

Quote
ACLU declares ‘transgender myths DEBUNKED,’ says trans girls don't have any ‘unfair advantage’ in women’s sports


got a good laugh reading this

This post was edited by Warlock316 on Feb 4 2021 11:31am
Member
Posts: 92,973
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Feb 4 2021 11:50am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 4 2021 08:57am)
South Park actually did a good episode on this.

The sports issue is the only issue I see a legitimate grievance on. The hormone / puberty blocker controversy is a non-starter since that's gated by doctors who have outcome-based metrics to follow. The bathroom thing is just gays getting married for the insurance 2 electric boogaloo. Problem is I haven't seen a good answer.

Although I also don't know if a 12% advantage is that significant. Like, I don't know enough about sports statistics to say if that's a little or a lot.


i can't think of a single sport where a 12% advantage isn't MASSIVE.

baseball for example a .300 career hitter is a hall of famer. a .18 hitter is a pitcher.

a 100 mph fastball is a hall of famer, an 88 mph pitch is a change up for that same pitcher.

12% difference in lifts is the difference between a gold medal and the people china sends just to fill out their team for all events.

Women's 100m dash world record is 10.49, mens 9.58. 9.5% difference even on a tiny margin type race.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Feb 4 2021 11:51am
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Feb 4 2021 01:36pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 4 2021 06:57am)
South Park actually did a good episode on this.

The sports issue is the only issue I see a legitimate grievance on. The hormone / puberty blocker controversy is a non-starter since that's gated by doctors who have outcome-based metrics to follow. The bathroom thing is just gays getting married for the insurance 2 electric boogaloo. Problem is I haven't seen a good answer.

Although I also don't know if a 12% advantage is that significant. Like, I don't know enough about sports statistics to say if that's a little or a lot.


12% is a massive difference, like snipa said. The sports issue is an exercise in futility. There's likely no way to perfectly resolve the issue, and it becomes a matter of finding the most fair and equitable outcome possible. We either preclude trans women from women's sport and essentially say they're 'not real women' or we forego scientific realities in the name of social virtue signaling, including to the detriment of competitive fairness. Efforts to do testosterone limits, HRT minimum timelines, etc. all attempt to find a middle-ground, but there's likely never going to be a perfect middle.

This post was edited by Handcuffs on Feb 4 2021 01:37pm
Member
Posts: 29,000
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Feb 4 2021 01:47pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Feb 4 2021 12:36pm)
12% is a massive difference, like snipa said. The sports issue is an exercise in futility. There's likely no way to perfectly resolve the issue, and it becomes a matter of finding the most fair and equitable outcome possible. We either preclude trans women from women's sport and essentially say they're 'not real women' or we forego scientific realities in the name of social virtue signaling, including to the detriment of competitive fairness. Efforts to do testosterone limits, HRT minimum timelines, etc. all attempt to find a middle-ground, but there's likely never going to be a perfect middle.


For weightlifting id never compete in a non-tested league since I have no interest in competing against those taking performance enhancing drugs since I myself don't have the % boost those drugs give you. I would think any competitive biological female who has sunk time in to trying to beat others would feel the same similar feeling when being asked if they would be okay competing with a biological male that on average has X% advantage. When you speak of mediums you speak as if there's any significant population. The perfect middle is having biological women compete against biological women from a pure numbers' standpoint. I don't see some need to alter everything to accommodate such a minor amount of people. That's just an opinion.


No one cares about rec leagues obviously, just anything competitive.
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Feb 4 2021 02:03pm
Quote (SBD @ Feb 4 2021 11:47am)
For weightlifting id never compete in a non-tested league since I have no interest in competing against those taking performance enhancing drugs since I myself don't have the % boost those drugs give you. I would think any competitive biological female who has sunk time in to trying to beat others would feel the same similar feeling when being asked if they would be okay competing with a biological male that on average has X% advantage. When you speak of mediums you speak as if there's any significant population. The perfect middle is having biological women compete against biological women from a pure numbers' standpoint. I don't see some need to alter everything to accommodate such a minor amount of people. That's just an opinion.

No one cares about rec leagues obviously, just anything competitive.


The issue though is the semantics of 'biological women'.
Member
Posts: 29,000
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Feb 4 2021 02:08pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Feb 4 2021 01:03pm)
The issue though is the semantics of 'biological women'.


A person born with XX chromosomes.
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Feb 4 2021 02:13pm
Quote (SBD @ Feb 4 2021 12:08pm)
A person born with XX chromosomes.


And, of course, the conflation of sex and gender.
Member
Posts: 28,878
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Feb 4 2021 02:18pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Feb 4 2021 03:13pm)
And, of course, the conflation of sex and gender.


To me, biological female meaning XX is very clear.
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Feb 4 2021 02:18pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Feb 4 2021 12:18pm)
To me, biological female meaning XX is very clear.


Indeed it is, to you.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1399400401402403587Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll