im really torn i dont like abortion but i also dont support your mothers right to choose.

My mom is 73.
She ain't choosing shit anymore.

Merry Christmas.

see, that's the problem with you anti-choice fundamentalists, you confuse religion for biology.

again, if you want fewer abortions, don't restrict women's rights - teach comprehensive sex education, have accessible healthcare, introduce laws supporting and protecting families, and overhaul the adoption system.
the fact that none of you radicals is talking about those things, while being comfortable with charging traumatised rape victims with murder for having an abortion, tells me everything i need to know for why religion and state should not mix. you're free to have those cruel, immoral, and shitty opinions - but they should never be made into law.

all duffman says is biology and you paint him as an evangelical. classic!

Nah, understanding basic biology is beyond you loliberals, who can't, even for a moment, admit that whether the fetus is a person or not, it is undeniably a human being. You've got no room to lecture about understanding biology here. None.

silly santara, the test fender uses for whether something is human or not is based on blue eyes and blonde hair. which of course fetuses do not have either of until much later on.

if you haven't read and don't know about the previous parts of the conversation i had with duff, you probably shouldn't comment on it.

i mean, it's no surprise to see you trying to get in a cheap shot against me, that's just what you do - but what i'm claiming in that post (duff being in favour of charging rape victims with murder for getting an abortion, not advocating for those measures i listed to achieve fewer abortions without restricting women's rights...), those are FACTS. again, it's in this very thread.

You forgot their choice in religion. nn judens.

I wonder how many of these people objecting the right for females to have the right to choose to have an abortion foster on a regular basis or consider adoption.

Better to just be against it and then subsequently bitch about the poverty cycle in America.

I'd guess almost none.

This post was edited by SBD on Dec 7 2021 11:07am

perhaps u can link where Duff used religion to justify his position. which was my entire point, dont worry ill help you.



i dont support duffs position, in fact i support yours, but u still jumped onto calling him religious then used his position for justification religion and law shouldnt mix, another thing i agree with, but another non sequitur. which was a silly thing to do.

do u even know duffs religion? do u even know his race? or nation of origin?

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 7 2021 11:09am